ReviewMolecular biology reports2016
Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection and identification of pathogens using agents targeting the bacterial cell wall.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Advances in methods for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025Review
- Development of fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- An Overview of Healthcare Associated Infections and Their Detection Methods Caused by Pathogen Bacteria in Romania and Europe.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Recent Developments in Phenotypic and Molecular Diagnostic Methods for Antimicrobial Resistance Detection inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bioprocessing and integration of a high flux screening systematic platform based on isothermal amplification for the detection on 8 common pathogens.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021Article
- "One-step" characterization platform for pathogenic genetics of Staphylococcus aureus.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2021Article
- Direct Detection of Viable but Non-culturable (VBNC) Salmonella in Real Food System by a Rapid and Accurate PMA-CPA Technique.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Development of a Direct and Rapid Detection Method for Viable but Non-culturable State ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Spoilage Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Brewing Industry.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Study on the Viable but Non-culturable (VBNC) State Formation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Effect of Environmental Conditions on the Formation of the Viable but Nonculturable State ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Reduction, Prevention, and Control ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Formation and Control of the Viable but Non-culturable State of Foodborne PathogenFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Comparison of rapid and conventional methods for investigating ofPakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the past decade, a number of chromogenic media for methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection have been developed and applied, including Oxoid Brilliance™ MRSA, CHROMagar™ MRSA, BBL™ CHROMagar™ MRSA, MRSASelect and chromID MRSA. The advantages of these chromogenic media offers direct detection of visible staphylococcal colonies, coupled with the use of chromogenic enzymatic substrates that can be hydrolyzed by S. aureus to confirm species or strain identification. BBL™ CHROMagar™ MRSA and MRSASelect are designed for detection of nasal colonization by MRSA, while CHROMagar™ MRSA, Oxoid Brilliance™ MRSA and chromID MRSA are readily applied in bacterial screening. This review summarizes the characteristics, principles and capacities of these selective media, and focuses on comparison of different chromogenic media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27562853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.