Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562834›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2016

Fat Grafting with Tissue Liquefaction Technology as an Adjunct to Breast Reconstruction.

Utku Dolen, Justin B Cohen, Bo Overschmidt, Marissa M Tenenbaum, Terence M Myckatyn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Current status and prospects of clinical application of liposuction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Utku DolenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 1040 N. Mason, Ste 124, St Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Justin B CohenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 1040 N. Mason, Ste 124, St Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Bo OverschmidtDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 1040 N. Mason, Ste 124, St Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Marissa M TenenbaumDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 1040 N. Mason, Ste 124, St Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Terence M MyckatynDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 1040 N. Mason, Ste 124, St Louis, MO, 63141, USA. myckatyn@wudosis.wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTissue liquefaction technology (TLT) delivers warmed saline from the liposuction cannula tip at low pressure pulses to disaggregate adipocytes. This technology differs significantly from that used in other liposuction devices including water jet-assisted liposuction. Here we introduce our early experience with this technology in the setting of fat transfer for revision breast reconstruction.

methodsA retrospective chart review of 136 consecutive patients who underwent fat harvest with TLT and subsequent transfer into 237 breast reconstructions was conducted at a single institution. This two-surgeon series examined donor and recipient site complication rates over a median follow-up of 143 days [87-233].

resultsThe overall complication rate was 28.7 %, of which the majority (22.1 %) was fat necrosis at the recipient site as documented by any clinical, imaging, or pathologic evidence. The abdomen served as the donor site for half of the cases. Donor site complications were limited to widespread ecchymosis of the donor site notable in 10.4 % of cases. Twenty-five percent of patients had received postmastectomy radiotherapy prior to fat transfer. Prior to revision with fat transfer, implant-based breast reconstruction was used in 75.5 % of cases, and autologous flaps in the remainder. Fat transfer was combined with other reconstructive procedures 94.1 % of the time.

conclusionsTLT can be used to harvest adipocytes for fat transfer with donor site morbidity and recipient site complications comparable to other modalities. The efficiency and quality of harvested fat makes this technology appealing for wide spread adoption during fat transfer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that the authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultBreast ImplantationBreast NeoplasmsChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansLipectomyMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBreast reconstructionFat graftFat transferLiposuctionTissue liquefaction technology

Identifiers

PMID27562834
PMCPMC5133286
OpenAlexW2514241877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.