Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562749›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2017

Animal NLRs provide structural insights into plant NLR function.

Adam Bentham, Hayden Burdett, Peter A Anderson, Simon J Williams, Bostjan Kobe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Constitutive Overexpression of an NB-ARC Gene from Wild ChineseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. NOD1 and NOD2 Are Potential Therapeutic Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. The Ups and Downs of PlantFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam BenthamSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Hayden BurdettSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Peter A AndersonSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Simon J WilliamsSchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Bostjan KobeSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Institute for Molecular Bioscience and Australian Infectious Diseases Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe plant immune system employs intracellular NLRs (nucleotide binding [NB], leucine-rich repeat [LRR]/nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain [NOD]-like receptors) to detect effector proteins secreted into the plant cell by potential pathogens. Activated plant NLRs trigger a range of immune responses, collectively known as the hypersensitive response (HR), which culminates in death of the infected cell. Plant NLRs show structural and functional resemblance to animal NLRs involved in inflammatory and innate immune responses. Therefore, knowledge of the activation and regulation of animal NLRs can help us understand the mechanism of action of plant NLRs, and vice versa. SCOPE: This review provides an overview of the innate immune pathways in plants and animals, focusing on the available structural and biochemical information available for both plant and animal NLRs. We highlight the gap in knowledge between the animal and plant systems, in particular the lack of structural information for plant NLRs, with crystal structures only available for the N-terminal domains of plant NLRs and an integrated decoy domain, in contrast to the more complete structures available for animal NLRs. We assess the similarities and differences between plant and animal NLRs, and use the structural information on the animal NLR pair NAIP/NLRC4 to derive a plausible model for plant NLR activation.

conclusionsSignalling by cooperative assembly formation (SCAF) appears to operate in most innate immunity pathways, including plant and animal NLRs. Our proposed model of plant NLR activation includes three key steps: (1) initially, the NLR exists in an inactive auto-inhibited state; (2) a combination of binding by activating elicitor and ATP leads to a structural rearrangement of the NLR; and (3) signalling occurs through cooperative assembly of the resistosome. Further studies, structural and biochemical in particular, will be required to provide additional evidence for the different features of this model and shed light on the many existing variations, e.g. helper NLRs and NLRs containing integrated decoys.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnatePlant ImmunityAnimalsNLR ProteinsPlantsNLR ProteinsAvirulence proteincryo-electron microscopycrystal structureeffector-triggered immunity (ETI)leucine-rich repeat (LRR)/nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor (NLR)nucleotide binding (NB)plant pathogen effector proteinresistance proteinthree-dimensional structure

Identifiers

PMID27562749
PMCPMC5378188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.