Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562584›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2016

Employer Policies and Practices to Manage and Prevent Disability: Foreword to the Special Issue.

William S Shaw, Chris J Main, Glenn Pransky, Michael K Nicholas, Johannes R Anema, Steven J Linton, Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing Continued Employability among People with Mental Illnesses: Development of a Scale in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Sustaining Work Participation Across the Life Course.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

William S ShawLiberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA. William.shaw@libertymutual.com.
Chris J MainArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care Sciences and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Glenn PranskyLiberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA, 01748, USA.
Michael K NicholasPain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Johannes R AnemaEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Steven J LintonCHAMP, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention
Örebro University · SEThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USLiberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Employer policies and practices have been shown to impact workplace disability, but research in this area has waned in recent years despite an aging workforce, a growing prevalence of chronic health conditions, and a larger proportion of working-age adults on permanent work disability in many jurisdictions. The purpose of this article is to describe the background rationale and methodology for an invited conference designed to improve research of employer strategies to curtail work disability. Methods A multidisciplinary team of 26 international researchers with published research in employer-based disability management or related fields were invited to attend a 3-day conference in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, USA. The overall goal was to review the status of current research of workplace disability management and prevention, examine its relevance for employer decision-making, compare conceptual frameworks or theoretical perspectives, and recommend future research directions. Working groups were organized and draft manuscripts were prepared in advance. Conference activities included working group presentations and critiques, discussions with a panel of industry consultants and advisors, group interaction and debate, generation of final recommendations, and manuscript revision. Results/Conclusion Six principal domains were established with respect to future research: (a) further elucidation of the key workplace factors that buffer the disabling effects of injury and illness; (b) more innovative and feasible options for workplace intervention; (c) measurement of workplace-relevant disability outcomes; (d) a stronger theoretical framework for understanding the factors behind employer uptake and implementation; (e) a focus on special clinical populations and occupations where disability risk is most troubling; and (f) better representation of workers and employers that reflect the diverse and changing nature of work. Final comments and recommendations of the working groups are presented in the following six articles in this special issue of the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. Conference attendees recommended changes in methodology, collaboration strategies, and theoretical perspectives to improve the practical and scientific impact of future research of employer practices.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthHumansOccupational InjuriesOrganizational PolicyPersons with DisabilitiesWorkplaceDisabilityDisability managementDisability preventionEmployerResearch priorities

Identifiers

PMID27562584
PMCPMC5104772
OpenAlexW2483126705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.