Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562507›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2016

Hippocampal malrotation is an anatomic variant and has no clinical significance in MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy.

Meng-Han Tsai, David N Vaughan, Yuliya Perchyonok, Greg J Fitt, Ingrid E Scheffer, Samuel F Berkovic, Graeme D Jackson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The changing landscape in epilepsy imaging: Unmasking subtle and unique entities.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng-Han TsaiDepartment of Medicine, Epilepsy Research Centre, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
David N VaughanDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yuliya PerchyonokDepartment of Radiology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Greg J FittDepartment of Radiology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ingrid E SchefferDepartment of Medicine, Epilepsy Research Centre, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel F BerkovicDepartment of Medicine, Epilepsy Research Centre, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Graeme D JacksonDepartment of Neurology, Austin Health, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. gjackson@brain.org.au.
Austin Health · AUAustin Hospital · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is considerable difficulty in diagnosing hippocampal malrotation (HIMAL), with different criteria of variable reliability. Here we assess qualitative and quantitative criteria in HIMAL diagnosis and explore the role of HIMAL in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

methodsWe studied the MRI of 155 adult patients with MRI-negative TLE and 103 healthy volunteers, and we asked (1) what are the qualitative and quantitative features that allow a reliable diagnosis of HIMAL, (2) how common is HIMAL in a normal control population, and (3) is HIMAL congruent with the epileptogenic side in MRI-negative TLE.

resultsWe found that the features that are most correlated with the expert diagnosis of HIMAL are hippocampal shape change with hippocampal diameter ratio > 0.8, lack of normal lateral convex margin, and a deep dominant inferior temporal sulcus (DITS) with DITS height ratio > 0.6. In a blinded analysis, a consensus diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral HIMAL was made in 25 of 103 controls (24.3% of people, 14.6% of hippocampi-14 left, six right, 10 bilateral) that did not differ from 155 lesion-negative TLE patients where 25 had HIMAL (16.1% of patients, 11.6% of hippocampi-12 left, two right, 11 bilateral). Of the 12 with left HIMAL only, 9 had seizures arising from the left temporal lobe, whereas 3 had right-sided seizures. Of the two with right HIMAL only, both had seizures arising from the left temporal lobe. SIGNIFICANCE: HIMAL is an anatomic variant commonly found in controls. HIMAL is also an incidental nonpathologic finding in adult MRI-negative TLE and should not influence surgical decision making.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleFunctional LateralityHippocampusHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantLogistic ModelsMaleHippocampal sclerosisIncomplete hippocampal infoldingLesion-negative epilepsyNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID27562507
OpenAlexW2510290377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.