Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562489›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2016

Evaluation of three commercial progesterone receptor assays in a single tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort.

Elizabeth N Kornaga, Alexander C Klimowicz, Natalia Guggisberg, Travis Ogilvie, Don G Morris, Marc Webster, Anthony M Magliocco

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Role of Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth N KornagaTranslational Laboratories, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alexander C KlimowiczBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT, USA.
Natalia GuggisbergTranslational Laboratories, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Travis OgilvieDepartment of Pathology, Calgary Laboratory Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Don G MorrisTranslational Laboratories, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marc WebsterDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Anthony M MaglioccoDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Alberta Health Services · CABoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USCalgary Laboratory Services · CAMoffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status are routinely assessed using immunohistochemistry assays to assist in patient prognosis and clinical management. Three commonly utilized autostainer vendors-Dako, Leica and Ventana-provide ready-to-use progesterone receptor assays; however, they have never been directly compared in a single breast cancer cohort. We looked at three immunohistochemical progesterone receptor assays, in addition to original ligand-binding assay results, in a single retrospective, tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort to investigate inter- and intra-observer agreement, concordance, prognostic ability and measures of test performance. All immunohistochemical assays utilized the manufacturer's specified protocols. Five-year disease-free survival was the endpoint of interest, and multivariate models were adjusted for lymph node status, tumor grade, tumor size and human epidermal growth factor 2 status. All assays showed substantial to almost perfect agreement between the three observers (Dako κ=0.69-0.90; Leica κ=0.70-0.89; and Ventana κ=0.78-0.94) and concordance (Dako/Leica κ=0.81; Dako/Ventana κ=0.78; and Leica/Ventana κ=0.82). Univariate survival analyses showed that only the ligand-binding assay, Dako and Ventana assays achieved statistical significance. No statistically significant results were seen in multivariate models, although a strong trend was seen with the Ventana progesterone receptor assay. All assays performed similarly with regards to measures of test performance with ligand-binding assay set as the reference, and all immunohistochemical assays outperformed the ligand-binding assay in regards to 5-year disease-free survival. Despite similar agreement and concordance with the progesterone receptor assays, clear differences were noted with regards to 5-year disease-free survival. Additional survival analyses suggest that clinical utility of estrogen receptor assays vary when investigated in combination with progesterone receptor.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateObserver VariationProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, ProgesteroneRetrospective StudiesSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenBiomarkers, TumorReagent Kits, DiagnosticReceptors, ProgesteroneSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID27562489
OpenAlexW2513447495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.