Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562485›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2016

Intermittent Demand Forecasting in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Chen-Yang Cheng, Kuo-Liang Chiang, Meng-Yin Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen-Yang ChengDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Republic of China. cycheng@ntut.edu.tw.
Kuo-Liang ChiangDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Kuang-Tien General Hospital, Shatian Road Shalu District, Taichung City, 433, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Meng-Yin ChenDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forecasts of the demand for medical supplies both directly and indirectly affect the operating costs and the quality of the care provided by health care institutions. Specifically, overestimating demand induces an inventory surplus, whereas underestimating demand possibly compromises patient safety. Uncertainty in forecasting the consumption of medical supplies generates intermittent demand events. The intermittent demand patterns for medical supplies are generally classified as lumpy, erratic, smooth, and slow-moving demand. This study was conducted with the purpose of advancing a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit's efforts to achieve a high level of accuracy in its forecasting of the demand for medical supplies. On this point, several demand forecasting methods were compared in terms of the forecast accuracy of each. The results confirm that applying Croston's method combined with a single exponential smoothing method yields the most accurate results for forecasting lumpy, erratic, and slow-moving demand, whereas the Simple Moving Average (SMA) method is the most suitable for forecasting smooth demand. In addition, when the classification of demand consumption patterns were combined with the demand forecasting models, the forecasting errors were minimized, indicating that this classification framework can play a role in improving patient safety and reducing inventory management costs in health care institutions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsForecastingHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansIntensive Care Units, PediatricMaterials Management, HospitalModels, TheoreticalTertiary Care CentersConsumption patternCroston’s methodIntermittent demandMaterial management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.