SynthesisEuropean radiology2017
Meta-analysis: adjusted indirect comparison of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus
Synthesis in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transarterial strategies for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is equally efficient and safe in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional TACE treatments: a result from CTILC study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019Trial
- Application of Nanotechnology in TACE Treatment of Liver Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- [Modern TARE 2023 - from palliative care to a curative treatment alternative].Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2024Article
- Ytrrium-90 transarterial radioembolization in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022Review
- [Clinical relevance of the new S3 guideline on hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract cancer for practitioners].Der Radiologe · 2022Review
- Step by Step: Managing the Complications of Cirrhosis.Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2021Review
- Genome-wide Enrichment of De Novo Coding Mutations in Orofacial Cleft Trios.American journal of human genetics · 2020Article
- Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer biology & medicine · 2018Article
- Clinical study of radiofrequency ablation combined with TACE in the treatment of breast cancer with liver metastasis.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Targeted Yttrium 89-Doxorubicin Drug-Eluting Bead-A Safety and Feasibility Pilot Study in a Rabbit Liver Cancer Model.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2017Article
- 2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate comparative effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus Yttrium-90 (
methodsStudies comparing conventional (c)TACE versus
resultsFourteen studies comparing DEB-TACE or
conclusionDEB-TACE and KEY POINTS: • This meta-analysis shows greater 1-year survival benefit for DEB-TACE over
Indexed as
Identifiers
27562480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.