Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27562347›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

High mobility, low access thwarts interventions among seasonal workers in the Greater Mekong Sub-region: lessons from the malaria containment project.

Sara E Canavati, Cesia E Quintero, Harriet L S Lawford, Sovann Yok, Dysoley Lek, Jack S Richards, Maxine Anne Whittaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara E CanavatiCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia. sara.canavati@burnet.edu.au.
Cesia E QuinteroCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Harriet L S LawfordThe National Centre For Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Corner Street 92, Trapaing Svay Village, Sankat Phnom Penh Thmey, Khan Sensok, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sovann YokProvincial Health Department, Pailin City, Pailin Province, Cambodia.
Dysoley LekThe National Centre For Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control, Ministry of Health, Corner Street 92, Trapaing Svay Village, Sankat Phnom Penh Thmey, Khan Sensok, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Jack S RichardsCentre for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Maxine Anne WhittakerCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the process of malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Sub-region, mobile and migrant populations (MMPs) have been identified as the most at-risk demographic. An important sub-group of MMPs are seasonal workers, and this paper presents an evaluation of the reach and effectiveness of interventions tailored towards this group and was carried out as part of the Containment Project from 2009-11.

methodsA mixed-methods study was conducted in Pailin Province in Western Cambodia. Three-hundred-and-four seasonal workers were surveyed using a structured questionnaire. Qualitative data were gathered through a total of eight focus group discussions and 14 in-depth interviews. Data triangulation of the qualitative and quantitative data was used during analysis.

resultsHigh mobility and low access of the target population to the interventions, as well as lack of social and anthropological research that led to implementation oversights, resulted in under-exposure of seasonal workers to interventions. Consequently, their reach and impact were severely limited. Some services, particularly Mobile Malaria Workers, had the ability to significantly impact key factors, such as risky behaviours among those they did reach. Others, like Listening and Viewing Clubs and mass media campaigns, showed little impact.

conclusionsThere is potential in two of the interventions assessed, but high mobility and inadequate exposure of seasonal workers to these interventions must be considered in the development and planning of future interventions to avoid investing in low-impact activities and ensure that all interventions perform according to their maximum potential. This will be critical in order for Cambodia to achieve its aim of malaria elimination. The lessons learned from this study can be extrapolated to other areas of health care in Cambodia and other countries in order to reduce the gap between healthcare provided to MMPs, especially seasonal workers, and to the general population.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsAdultCambodiaCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalariaMaleYoung AdultArtemisinin resistanceCambodiaCommunity malaria workerHealth system strengtheningMalaria eliminationMobile malaria workerSustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID27562347
PMCPMC5000443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.