ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2017
Assessing the effect of a nude mouse model on nanoparticle-mediated gene delivery.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant α-Toxin BmK-M9 Inhibits Breast Cancer Progression by Regulating β-Catenin In Vivo.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- The Effect of Repeat Administration of Lipoplexes on Gene Delivery, Biodistribution, and Cytokine Response in Immunocompetent Tumor-Bearing Mice.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Article
- The Use of Lactose as an Alternative Coating for Nanoparticles.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2020Article
- Nanoparticle uptake by circulating leukocytes: A major barrier to tumor delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2018Article
- Drug delivery and tissue engineering to promote wound healing in the immunocompromised host: Current challenges and future directions.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2018Review
- Nonadditive Effects of Repetitive Administration of Lipoplexes in Immunocompetent Mice.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The relevance of using nude mouse models for evaluating drug delivery to human tumors has recently been questioned by numerous researchers. While the immune response is known to play a critical role in cancer, this study assesses the effect of using immunocompromised "nude" mice on drug delivery. By inoculating both nude and immunocompetent mice with a mouse mammary carcinoma cell line (4T1), differences in the "first pass effect", distribution, and reporter gene expression due to the use of the nude mouse model could be elucidated. Our results indicate that initial tumor deposition (5 min) was slightly lower in nude mice but comparable after 24 h. In addition, some small differences in tissue deposition/accumulation and reporter gene expression were observed between the two mouse models. The results with this one tumor model suggest that delivery studies conducted in nude mice can provide comparable results to those in immunocompetent mouse models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.