ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016
Radiation Dose Reduction in 4D Cerebral CT Angiography by Individualized Estimation of Cerebral Circulation Time.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is four-dimensional CT angiography as effective as digital subtraction angiography in the detection of the underlying causes of intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2020Pooled it
- 4D-DSA for Assessment of the Angioarchitecture and Grading of Cranial Dural AVF.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Image-quality characteristics in the longitudinal direction from different image-reconstruction algorithms during single-rotation volume acquisition on head computed tomography: A phantom study.Acta radiologica open · 2023Article
- 4D Flat Panel Conebeam CTA for In Vivo Imaging of the Microvasculature of the Human Cortex with a Novel Software Prototype.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe novel technique of 4D CTA for dynamic assessment of the intracranial vessels has a greater radiation burden than conventional CTA. Previous descriptions of the technique used a fixed-duration exposure protocol. This study examines the potential for dose reduction by individualizing exposure time to patient physiology by the use of time-enhancement curve techniques as previously applied in CT angiography and venography. MATERIALS AND
methods4D-CTA examinations performed at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Scan protocols used a test-bolus scan with either a subjective estimate of the main acquisition timing (estimated-duration method) or a quantitative measure (measured-duration method). The estimated-duration method used peak arterial enhancement to determine the start of exposure, with the duration chosen at the radiologist's discretion. The measured-duration method used arterial and venous time-enhancement curves to determine exposure start and duration. Exposure duration, study adequacy, quality score, and maximum venous enhancement were compared among groups.
resultsOne hundred fifty-one examinations used the estimated-duration method, and 53 used measured-duration. The measured-duration method used a shorter exposure time (10 versus 15.8 seconds; P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the study adequacy rate, subjective quality score, or maximum venous enhancement. The radiation dose was reduced by 51% in the measured-duration method (3021 mGy × cm, 6.9 mSv, versus 1473 mGy × cm, 3.4 mSv). Both methods showed good agreement with DSA (κ = 0.88 for estimated-duration, κ = 1.0 for measured duration).
conclusionsExposure time in 4D-CTA can be reduced with dual time-enhancement curves to match exposure to physiology without degrading study adequacy or quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.