Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27561822›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Comparison of active treatments for impaired glucose regulation: a Salford Royal Foundation Trust and Hitachi collaboration (CATFISH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Peter A Coventry, Peter Bower, Amy Blakemore, Liz Baker, Mark Hann, Angela Paisley, Charlotte Renwick, Jinshuo Li, Atushi Ugajin, Martin Gibson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter A CoventryMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK. peter.coventry@york.ac.uk.
Peter BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Amy BlakemoreNIHR School for Primary Care Research and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Liz BakerNIHR School for Primary Care Research and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Mark HannCentre for Biostatistics and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Angela PaisleySalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
Charlotte RenwickMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Jinshuo LiMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Atushi UgajinInformation Systems Group, Hitachi Europe Limited, London, NW1 5DH, UK.
Martin GibsonSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of York · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBHitachi (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is highly prevalent and contributes to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Behaviour change interventions that target health and lifestyle factors associated with the onset of diabetes can delay progression to diabetes, but many approaches rely on intensive one-to-one contact by specialists. Health coaching is an approach based on motivational interviewing that can potentially deliver behaviour change interventions by non-specialists at a larger scale. This trial protocol describes a randomized controlled trial (CATFISH) that tests whether a web-enhanced telephone health coaching intervention (IGR3) is more acceptable and efficient than a telephone-only health coaching intervention (IGR2) for people with prediabetes (impaired glucose regulation).

methodsCATFISH is a two-parallel group, single-centre individually randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants are patients aged ≥18 years with impaired glucose regulation (HbA1c concentration between 42 and 47 mmol/mol), have access to a telephone and home internet and have been referred to an existing telephone health coaching service at Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK. Participants who give written informed consent will be randomized remotely (via a clinical trials unit) to either the existing pathway (IGR2) or the new web-enhanced pathway (IGR3) for 9 months. The primary outcome measure is patient acceptability at 9 months, determined using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures at 9 months are: cost of delivery of IGR2 and IGR3, mental health, quality of life, patient activation, self-management, weight (kg), HbA1c concentration, and body mass index. All outcome measures will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. A qualitative process evaluation will explore the experiences of participants and providers with a focus on understanding usability of interventions, mechanisms of behaviour change, and impact of context on delivery and user acceptability. Qualitative data will be analyzed using Framework. DISCUSSION: The CATFISH trial will provide a pragmatic assessment of whether a web-based information technology platform can enhance acceptability of a telephone health coaching intervention for people with prediabetes. The data will prove critical in understanding the role of web applications to improve engagement with evidence-based approaches to preventing diabetes.

trial registrationISRCTN16534814 . Registered on 7 February 2016.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisCounselingEnglandGlycated HemoglobinHealth Care CostsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth StatusHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisInternetPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27561822
PMCPMC5000461
OpenAlexW2513975389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.