Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27561633›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Esophagectomy Following Endoscopic Resection of Submucosal Esophageal Cancer: a Highly Curative Procedure Even with Nodal Metastases.

Daniela Molena, Francisco Schlottmann, Joshua A Boys, Shanda H Blackmon, Karen J Dickinson, Christy M Dunst, Wayne L Hofstetter, Michal J Lada, Brian E Louie, Benedetto Mungo and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Surgical strategy for early stage carcinoma of the esophagus].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  18. Surgical vs Endoscopic Management of T1 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Modeling Decision Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2018
    Article
  19. Current Concepts in Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With and Without Dysplasia.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Review
  20. Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus and Early Esophageal Cancer; Summary of the Kelly and Carlos Pellegrini SSAT/SAGES Luncheon Symposium.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela MolenaThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. molenad@mskcc.org.
Francisco SchlottmannThoracic Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Joshua A BoysDepartment of Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Shanda H BlackmonDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Karen J DickinsonDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Christy M DunstDepartment of Surgery, The Oregon Clinic, Portland, OR, USA.
Wayne L HofstetterDepartment of Surgery, MD Anderson, Houston, TX, USA.
Michal J LadaDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Brian E LouieDepartment of Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Benedetto MungoDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas J WatsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Steven R DeMeesterDepartment of Surgery, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · USJohns Hopkins University · USOregon Clinic · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increased risk for nodal disease, definitive endoscopic resection is being increasingly offered for lesions invasive into the submucosa based on the success with intramucosal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival after esophagectomy alone for confirmed submucosal tumors after endoscopic resection.

methodsPatients from seven centers in the USA who underwent esophagectomy for submucosal tumors removed with endoscopic resection were analyzed. Nodal involvement was correlated with recurrence and survival.

resultsWe identified 23 patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophagectomy was performed at a median of 2 months (Interquartile range 1-3) after the endoscopic resection. There was no postoperative mortality. Positive nodal disease was seen in 26 % of patients on final pathology. At a median of 37 months (Interquartile range 25-55), 91 % of patients were alive and free of disease. The disease-specific 5-year survival was 88 %. Disease-specific 5-year survival was 67 % in patients with positive nodal metastases and 100 % in those without (p = 0.159).

conclusionsEsophagectomy is curative in the majority of patients with submucosal tumors even in the presence of nodal metastases. These data serve as a benchmark for comparison when considering extending the indications for therapeutic endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors in the future.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overEsophageal MucosaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisEndoscopic therapyEsophageal cancerEsophagectomyT1b adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27561633
OpenAlexW2511843522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.