Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27561457›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2016

Comparative evaluation of the sexual functions and NF-κB and Nrf2 pathways of some aphrodisiac herbal extracts in male rats.

Kazim Sahin, Cemal Orhan, Fatih Akdemir, Mehmet Tuzcu, Hasan Gencoglu, Nurhan Sahin, Gaffari Turk, Ismet Yilmaz, Ibrahim H Ozercan, Vijaya Juturu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects ofBioMed research international · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. A proprietary blend of standardizedInternational journal of medical sciences · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Protective effects of ThaiJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Critical review of theBulletin of the National Research Centre · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kazim SahinDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey. nsahinkm@yahoo.com.
Cemal OrhanDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
Fatih AkdemirDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Fisheries, Inonu University, Malatya, 44280, Turkey.
Mehmet TuzcuDivision of Biology, Faculty of Science, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
Hasan GencogluDivision of Biology, Faculty of Science, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
Nurhan SahinDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
Gaffari TurkDepartment of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
Ismet YilmazDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Inonu University, Malatya, 44100, Turkey.
Ibrahim H OzercanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, 23119, Elazig, Turkey.
Vijaya JuturuResearch and Development, OmniActive Health Technologies Inc., Morristown, NJ, USA.
Fırat University · TRInonu University · TROmniActive Health Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucuna pruriens, Tribulus terrestris and Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) are widely known as antioxidant effective herbals and have been reported to possess aphrodisiac activities in traditional usages. In this study, we determined the effects of these herbals on sexual functions, serum biochemical parameters, oxidative stress and levels of NF-κB, Nrf2, and HO-1 in reproductive tissues.

methodsThirty-five male rats were divided into five groups: the control group, sildenafil-treated group (5 mg/kg/d), Mucuna, Tribulus and Ashwagandha groups. The extract groups were treated orally either with Mucuna, Tribulus or Ashwagandha (300 mg/kg b.w.) for 8 weeks.

resultsAll of the extracts were found to be significantly effective in sexual functioning and antioxidant capacity and Tribulus showed the highest effectiveness. Serum testosterone levels significantly increased in Tribulus and Ashwagandha groups in comparison to control group. Tribulus was able to reduce the levels of NF-κB and increase the levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 to a much greater extent than Mucuna and Ashwagandha.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate for the first time that Mucuna, Tribulus and Ashwagandha supplementation improves sexual function in male rats via activating Nrf2/ HO-1 pathway while inhibiting the NF-κB levels. Moreover, Tribulus terrestris extract was found to be more bioavailable from Ashwagandha extract followed by Mucuna extract. Schematic representation of the mode of action of some aphrodisiac herbal extracts to improve sexual functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAphrodisiacsFertilityGenitalia, MaleMaleNF-E2-Related Factor 2NF-kappa BPlant ExtractsRatsSexual Behavior, AnimalSignal TransductionSpermatozoaAphrodisiacsNfe2l2 protein, ratNF-E2-Related Factor 2NF-kappa BPlant ExtractsFertilityMucuna pruriensReproductive organsSexual enhancerTribulus terrestrisWithania somnifera

Identifiers

PMID27561457
PMCPMC5000417
OpenAlexW2513299263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.