Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27561358›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

OGS2: genome re-annotation of the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis.

Alfredo Rago, Donald G Gilbert, Jeong-Hyeon Choi, Timothy B Sackton, Xu Wang, Yogeshwar D Kelkar, John H Werren, John K Colbourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alfredo RagoEnvironmental Genomics Group, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Donald G GilbertDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. gilbertd@indiana.edu.
Jeong-Hyeon ChoiCancer Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, USA.
Timothy B SacktonDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, and FAS Informatics Group, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Xu WangDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell Center for Comparative and Population Genomics, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Yogeshwar D KelkarDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical School, Rochester, USA.
John H WerrenDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA. jack.werren@rochester.edu.
John K ColbourneEnvironmental Genomics Group, School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. J.K.Colbourne@bahm.ac.uk.

Funding

Genetic and genomic tools for the emerging model organsism, NasoniaR24GM084917 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WERREN, JOHN HAYNES · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM084917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNasonia vitripennis is an emerging insect model system with haplodiploid genetics. It holds a key position within the insect phylogeny for comparative, evolutionary and behavioral genetic studies. The draft genomes for N. vitripennis and two sibling species were published in 2010, yet a considerable amount of transcriptiome data have since been produced thereby enabling improvements to the original (OGS1.2) annotated gene set. We describe and apply the EvidentialGene method used to produce an updated gene set (OGS2). We also carry out comparative analyses showcasing the usefulness of the revised annotated gene set.

resultsThe revised annotation (OGS2) now consists of 24,388 genes with supporting evidence, compared to 18,850 for OGS1.2. Improvements include the nearly complete annotation of untranslated regions (UTR) for 97 % of the genes compared to 28 % of genes for OGS1.2. The fraction of RNA-Seq validated introns also grow from 85 to 98 % in this latest gene set. The EST and RNA-Seq expression data provide support for several non-protein coding loci and 7712 alternative transcripts for 4146 genes. Notably, we report 180 alternative transcripts for the gene lola. Nasonia now has among the most complete insect gene set; only 27 conserved single copy orthologs in arthropods are missing from OGS2. Its genome also contains 2.1-fold more duplicated genes and 1.4-fold more single copy genes than the Drosophila melanogaster genome. The Nasonia gene count is larger than those of other sequenced hymenopteran species, owing both to improvements in the genome annotation and to unique genes in the wasp lineage. We identify 1008 genes and 171 gene families that deviate significantly from other hymenopterans in their rates of protein evolution and duplication history, respectively. We also provide an analysis of alternative splicing that reveals that genes with no annotated isoforms are characterized by shorter transcripts, fewer introns, faster protein evolution and higher probabilities of duplication than genes having alternative transcripts.

conclusionsGenome-wide expression data greatly improves the annotation of the N. vitripennis genome, by increasing the gene count, reducing the number of missing genes and providing more comprehensive data on splicing and gene structure. The improved gene set identifies lineage-specific genomic features tied to Nasonia's biology, as well as numerous novel genes. OGS2 and its associated search tools are available at http://arthropods.eugenes.org/EvidentialGene/nasonia/ , www.hymenopteragenome.org/nasonia/ and waspAtlas: www.tinyURL.com/waspAtlas . The EvidentialGene pipeline is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/evidentialgene/ .

Indexed as

Genome, InsectGenomicsAlternative SplicingAnimalsComputational BiologyContig MappingDatabases, Nucleic AcidEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGenes, InsectGenome-Wide Association StudyMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyOpen Reading FramesRNA, UntranslatedSoftwareRNA, UntranslatedAlternative gene splicingGene duplicationGenome annotationHistonesHymenopteraParasitoid waspProtein evolutionTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27561358
PMCPMC5000498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.