Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27561336›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2016

Evaluation of a trauma team activation protocol revision: a prospective cohort study.

Trond Dehli, Svein Arne Monsen, Knut Fredriksen, Kristian Bartnes

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The potential of point-of-care diagnostics to optimise prehospital trauma triage: a systematic review of literature.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Trauma team activation-Who should be alerted for which patients?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. [Measurability of the quality of care of the severely injured].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  11. Application of trauma time axis management in the treatment of severe trauma patients.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Undertriage in trauma: an ignored quality indicator?Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A quality-improvement approach to effective trauma team activationCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2019
    Article
  17. Better compliance with triage criteria in trauma would reduce costs with maintained patient safety.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Undertriage of major trauma patients at a university hospital: a retrospective cohort study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trond DehliDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital North Norway (UNN), 9038, Tromsø, Norway. trond.dehli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-9385
Svein Arne MonsenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Helgeland Hospital, 8801, Sandnessjøen, Norway.
Knut FredriksenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT- The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Kristian BartnesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT- The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrect triage based on prehospital information contributes to a better outcome for potentially seriously injured patients. In 2011 we changed the trauma team activation (TTA) criteria in our center in order to improve the high over- and undertriage properties of the protocol. Five criteria that were unable to predict severe injury were removed. In the present study, we evaluated the protocol revision by comparing over- and undertriage in the former and present set of criteria.

methodsAll severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15) and all patients admitted with TTA in the period of 01.01.2013 - 31.12.2014 were included in the study. We defined overtriage as the fraction of patients with TTA when ISS ≤15 and undertriage as the fraction of patients without TTA when ISS > 15. We also evaluated triage with the occurrence of emergency procedures immediately after admission.

results324 patients were included, 164 patients had ISS>15, 287 were admitted with TTA. Over- and undertriage were 74 % and 28 % respectively. When we used emergency procedure as reference, the figures were 83 % and 15 % respectively. Undertriaged patients had significantly more neurosurgical injuries and were significantly more often transferred from an acute care hospital. DISCUSSION: Over- and undertriage are almost the same as before the criteria were revised, and higher thanrecommended levels.

conclusionsRevision of the TTA criteria has not improved triage, and further measures are necessary to achieveacceptable levels.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPatient TransferProspective StudiesEmergency treatmentPatient transferTraumaTriage

Identifiers

PMID27561336
PMCPMC5000402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.