ReviewClinical endoscopy2016
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Polyps: A Western Colonoscopist's View.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome after colorectal full-thickness resection and management of recurrence.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Article
- Do surface morphology and pit pattern have a role in predicting cancer for colon polyps in North America?Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- From advanced diagnosis to advanced resection in early neoplastic colorectal lesions: Never-ending and trending topics in the 2020s.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022Review
- Risk factors for local recurrence of large gastrointestinal lesions after endoscopic mucosal resection.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Article
- Current Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Gastrointestinal Lesions: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Submucosal Dissection, and Full-Thickness Resection.Visceral medicine · 2021Review
- The Mettle to Use the Petals: Using Over-the-Scope Rings to Optimize Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- ESD and Pit Pattern Diagnosis: Lessons from a Japanese Endoscopist Working in the United States.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020Review
- Features of endoscopic procedure site reaction associated with a recently approved submucosal lifting agent.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020Article
- Endoscopic mucosal resection with an additional working channel (EMR+) in a porcine ex vivo model: a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate of snare polypectomy.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- How Is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Lesions Being Implemented? Results from an International Survey.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Modular laser-based endoluminal ablation of the gastrointestinal tract: in vivo dose-effect evaluation and predictive numerical model.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Colorectal Lesions in China.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colon Polyps.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Article
- New Strategies to Improve Polypectomy During Colonoscopy.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Article
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: patient selection and special considerations.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Endoscopic management of colorectal adenomas.Annals of gastroenterology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To discuss the rationale for the widespread application of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) rather than endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Western centers. In Western centers, EMR is the treatment of choice for most non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas >2 cm in size. EMR is sufficiently effective and safe to be performed without post-procedure hospitalization. Advances in EMR have led to reduced recurrence rates, and recent studies have demonstrated excellent outcomes with endoscopic treatment of recurrent adenomas. While studies from Asia have demonstrated lower recurrence rates with ESD, concern about the higher perforation risk and lengthy procedure time of ESD are two of the barriers preventing widespread adoption of ESD in the West. EMR is likely to continue as the dominant method for the treatment of large colorectal adenomas in Western centers until the limitations of ESD are overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.