ArticlePloS one2016
DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 247 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
247 citing papers in PubMed.
- Massive Sampling Strategy for Antibody-Antigen Targets in CAPRI Round 55 With MassiveFold.Proteins · 2026Article
- AlphaFold and Docking Approaches for Antibody-Antigen and Other Targets: Insights From CAPRI Rounds 47-55.Proteins · 2026Article
- Evaluating AlphaFold Tools and Related Scoring Functions for Protein-peptide Complex Prediction.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2026Article
- TINA: a geometry-aware post-hoc scoring framework for protein-protein interaction.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- TurboID proximity labeling reveals protein interaction networks for germline Argonautes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Combining AI Structure Prediction and Integrative Modeling for Nanobody-Antigen Complexes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- A simple probabilistic AlphaFold interaction score.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- ABAG-Rank: improving model selection of AlphaFold antibody-antigen complexes by learning to rank.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- From Ternary Modeling to Predictive PROTAC Design: A Computational Perspective.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Structure-based TCR-pMHC binding prediction and generalization to unseen peptides.npj drug discovery · 2026Article
- Pocket restraints guided by B-cell epitope prediction improve Chai-1 antibody-antigen structure modeling.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- COMPASS: A Computational Pipeline to Identify Linkers Predicting Ubiquitinable PROTAC-Induced Ternary Complexes.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- Benchmarking AlphaFold and related deep learning approaches for modeling antibody and TCR antigen recognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Peptide design through binding interface mimicry with PepMimic.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A Chromatin Biology Assessment of AlphaFold3.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mapping the TCR landscape: computational tools empowering translational immunology and therapy design.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Review
- Navigating the uncharted: AI-driven advances in protein structure, dynamics, interactions and ligand interactions for understudied families.BioData mining · 2026Review
- DeepRank-Ab: a scoring function for antibody-antigen complexes based on geometric deep learning.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Improving protein and protein interactions using pseudo-dimers derived from monomeric proteins.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Benchmarking TCR-pMHC structure prediction: a unified evaluation and CDR3-based functional insights.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
187 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The state-of-the-art to assess the structural quality of docking models is currently based on three related yet independent quality measures: Fnat, LRMS, and iRMS as proposed and standardized by CAPRI. These quality measures quantify different aspects of the quality of a particular docking model and need to be viewed together to reveal the true quality, e.g. a model with relatively poor LRMS (>10Å) might still qualify as 'acceptable' with a descent Fnat (>0.50) and iRMS (<3.0Å). This is also the reason why the so called CAPRI criteria for assessing the quality of docking models is defined by applying various ad-hoc cutoffs on these measures to classify a docking model into the four classes: Incorrect, Acceptable, Medium, or High quality. This classification has been useful in CAPRI, but since models are grouped in only four bins it is also rather limiting, making it difficult to rank models, correlate with scoring functions or use it as target function in machine learning algorithms. Here, we present DockQ, a continuous protein-protein docking model quality measure derived by combining Fnat, LRMS, and iRMS to a single score in the range [0, 1] that can be used to assess the quality of protein docking models. By using DockQ on CAPRI models it is possible to almost completely reproduce the original CAPRI classification into Incorrect, Acceptable, Medium and High quality. An average PPV of 94% at 90% Recall demonstrating that there is no need to apply predefined ad-hoc cutoffs to classify docking models. Since DockQ recapitulates the CAPRI classification almost perfectly, it can be viewed as a higher resolution version of the CAPRI classification, making it possible to estimate model quality in a more quantitative way using Z-scores or sum of top ranked models, which has been so valuable for the CASP community. The possibility to directly correlate a quality measure to a scoring function has been crucial for the development of scoring functions for protein structure prediction, and DockQ should be useful in a similar development in the protein docking field. DockQ is available at http://github.com/bjornwallner/DockQ/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.