Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27560178›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes.

Mark-Anthony Bray, Shantanu Singh, Han Han, Chadwick T Davis, Blake Borgeson, Cathy Hartland, Maria Kost-Alimova, Sigrun M Gustafsdottir, Christopher C Gibson, Anne E Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 546 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
546citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

546 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review of in vitro approaches for assessing the toxicity of chemical stressors across diverse physiological systems.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

486 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark-Anthony BrayImaging Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9748-3592
Shantanu SinghImaging Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Han HanRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Chadwick T DavisRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Blake BorgesonRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Cathy HartlandCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Maria Kost-AlimovaCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sigrun M GustafsdottirCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Christopher C GibsonRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Broad Institute · USArrien Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

Continued Development of CellProfiler Cell Image Analysis SoftwareR01GM089652 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARPENTER, ANNE E. · 2010 to 2016
$3.7M
Expansion of an efficient drug repurposing platform for rare genetic diseases.R44TR001197 · NCATS · RECURSION PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC · PI GIBSON, CHRISTOPHER · 2015 to 2016
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR001197NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In morphological profiling, quantitative data are extracted from microscopy images of cells to identify biologically relevant similarities and differences among samples based on these profiles. This protocol describes the design and execution of experiments using Cell Painting, which is a morphological profiling assay that multiplexes six fluorescent dyes, imaged in five channels, to reveal eight broadly relevant cellular components or organelles. Cells are plated in multiwell plates, perturbed with the treatments to be tested, stained, fixed, and imaged on a high-throughput microscope. Next, an automated image analysis software identifies individual cells and measures ∼1,500 morphological features (various measures of size, shape, texture, intensity, and so on) to produce a rich profile that is suitable for the detection of subtle phenotypes. Profiles of cell populations treated with different experimental perturbations can be compared to suit many goals, such as identifying the phenotypic impact of chemical or genetic perturbations, grouping compounds and/or genes into functional pathways, and identifying signatures of disease. Cell culture and image acquisition takes 2 weeks; feature extraction and data analysis take an additional 1-2 weeks.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell ShapeCell SizeFluorescent DyesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMolecular ImagingStaining and LabelingFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID27560178
PMCPMC5223290
OpenAlexW2498090354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.