Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27559850›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2016

DNA damage responsive miR-33b-3p promoted lung cancer cells survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting p21

Shun Xu, Haijiao Huang, Yu-Ning Chen, Yun-Ting Deng, Bing Zhang, Xing-Dong Xiong, Yuan Yuan, Yanmei Zhu, Haiyong Huang, Luoyijun Xie and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Crude extract ofBioMedicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Role of P21 in Resistance of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shun Xua Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Haijiao Huanga Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Yu-Ning Chena Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Yun-Ting Denga Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Bing Zhanga Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Xing-Dong Xionga Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Yuan Yuana Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Yanmei Zhua Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Haiyong Huanga Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Luoyijun Xiea Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Xinguang Liua Institute of Aging Research, Guangdong Medical University , Dongguan , P.R. China.
Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNGuangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin is the most potent and widespread used chemotherapy drug for lung cancer treatment. However, the development of resistance to cisplatin is a major obstacle in clinical therapy. The principal mechanism of cisplatin is the induction of DNA damage, thus the capability of DNA damage response (DDR) is a key factor that influences the cisplatin sensitivity of cancer cells. Recent advances have demonstrated that miRNAs (microRNAs) exerted critical roles in DNA damage response; nonetheless, the association between DNA damage responsive miRNAs and cisplatin resistance and its underlying molecular mechanism still require further investigation. The present study has attempted to identify differentially expressed miRNAs in cisplatin induced DNA damage response in lung cancer cells, and probe into the effects of the misexpressed miRNAs on cisplatin sensitivity. Deep sequencing showed that miR-33b-3p was dramatically down-regulated in cisplatin-induced DNA damage response in A549 cells; and ectopic expression of miR-33b-3p endowed the lung cancer cells with enhanced survival and decreased γH2A.X expression level under cisplatin treatment. Consistently, silencing of miR-33b-3p in the cisplatin-resistant A549/DDP cells evidently sensitized the cells to cisplatin. Furthermore, we identified CDKN1A (p21) as a functional target of miR-33b-3p, a critical regulator of G1/S checkpoint, which potentially mediated the protection effects of miR-33b-3p against cisplatin. In aggregate, our results suggested that miR-33b-3p modulated the cisplatin sensitivity of cancer cells might probably through impairing the DNA damage response. And the knowledge of the drug resistance conferred by miR-33b-3p has great clinical implications for improving the efficacy of chemotherapies for treating lung cancers.

Indexed as

A549 CellsBase SequenceCell SurvivalCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DNA DamageDNA RepairDown-RegulationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHEK293 CellsHumansLung NeoplasmsMicroRNAsCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21MicroRNAsMIRN33a microRNA, humancell survivalcisplatin resistanceDNA damage responsemicroRNAmiR-33b-3pp21

Identifiers

PMID27559850
PMCPMC5105918
OpenAlexW2512633620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.