Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27559763›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2016

A qualitative study of patient experiences of decentralized acute healthcare services.

Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen, Lilliana Del Busso, Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl, Waleed Ghanima, Paul Barach, Lars-Petter Jelsness-Jørgensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. First four years of operation of a municipal acute bed unit in rural Norway.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2018
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Patient trajectories in a Norwegian unit of municipal emergency beds.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2017
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsena Department of Research , Østfold Hospital Trust , Sarpsborg, Østfold , Norway ;
Lilliana Del Bussoc Faculty of Health and Social Studies , Østfold University College , Sarpsborg, Østfold , Norway ;
Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahlc Faculty of Health and Social Studies , Østfold University College , Sarpsborg, Østfold , Norway ;
Waleed Ghanimaa Department of Research , Østfold Hospital Trust , Sarpsborg, Østfold , Norway ;
Paul Barachd Wayne University School of Medicine , Detriot, MI , USA.
Lars-Petter Jelsness-Jørgensena Department of Research , Østfold Hospital Trust , Sarpsborg, Østfold , Norway ;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMunicipality acute wards (MAWs) have recently been launched in Norway as an alternative to hospitalizations, and are aimed at providing treatment for patients who otherwise would have been hospitalized. The objective of this study was to explore how patients normally admitted to hospitals perceived the quality and safety of treatment in MAWs.

designThe study had a qualitative design. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

settingThe study was conducted in a county in south-eastern Norway and included five different MAWs. PATIENTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 participants who had required acute health care and who had been discharged from the five MAWs.

resultsThree subthemes were identified that related to the overarching theme of hospital-like standards ("almost a hospital, but…"), namely (a) treatment and competence, (b) location and physical environment, and (c) adequate time for care. Participants reported the treatment to be comparable to hospital care, but they also experienced limitations. Participants spoke positively about MAW personnel and the advantages of having a single patient room, a calm environment, and proximity to home.

conclusionsParticipants felt safe when treated at MAWs, even though they realized that the diagnostic services were not similar to that in hospitals. Geographical proximity, treatment facilities and time for care positively distinguished MAWs from hospitals, while the lack of diagnostic resources was stressed as a limitation. Key points   Municipality acute wards (MAWs) have been implemented across Norway. Research on patient perspectives on the decentralization of acute healthcare in MAWs is lacking.   • Patients perceive decentralized acute healthcare and treatment as being comparable to the quality they would have expected in hospitals.   • Geographical proximity, a home-like atmosphere and time for care were aspects stressed as positive features of the decentralized services.   • Lack of diagnostic resources was seen as a limitation.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthEmergency Medical ServicesPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality of Health CareAcute healthcaredecentralizationgeneral practicehospital-primary care interfaceNorwaypatient experiencesquality of care

Identifiers

PMID27559763
PMCPMC5036023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.