ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2017
Let's stay together? Intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved in pair bond dissolution in a recolonizing wolf population.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Map of death: spatially explicit mortality of the grey wolf.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Assessment of genetic diversity, population structure and wolf-dog hybridisation in the Eastern Romanian Carpathian wolf population.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Human-caused wolf mortality persists for years after discontinuation of hunting.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Scavenging patterns of an inbred wolf population in a landscape with a pulse of human-provided carrion.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- GPS collars have an apparent positive effect on the survival of a large carnivore.Biology letters · 2021Article
- Age at first reproduction in wolves: different patterns of density dependence for females and males.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Liberalizing the killing of endangered wolves was associated with more disappearances of collared individuals in Wisconsin, USA.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Testing the influence of habitat experienced during the natal phase on habitat selection later in life in Scandinavian wolves.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Geographic patterns in morphometric and genetic variation for coyote populations with emphasis on southeastern coyotes.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- No place like home? A test of the natal habitat-biased dispersal hypothesis in Scandinavian wolves.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Habitat segregation between brown bears and gray wolves in a human-dominated landscape.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Size-assortative choice and mate availability influences hybridization between red wolves (Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
- Couch potatoes do better: Delayed dispersal and territory size affect the duration of territory occupancy in a monogamous mammal.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- Let's stay together? Intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved in pair bond dissolution in a recolonizing wolf population.The Journal of animal ecology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For socially monogamous species, breeder bond dissolution has important consequences for population dynamics, but the extent to which extrinsic or intrinsic population factors causes pair dissolution remain poorly understood, especially among carnivores. Using an extensive life-history data set, a survival analysis and competing risks framework, we examined the fate of 153 different wolf (Canis lupus) pairs in the recolonizing Scandinavian wolf population, during 14 winters of snow tracking and DNA monitoring. Wolf pair dissolution was generally linked to a mortality event and was strongly affected by extrinsic (i.e. anthropogenic) causes. No divorce was observed, and among the pair dissolution where causes have been identified, death of one or both wolves was always involved. Median time from pair formation to pair dissolution was three consecutive winters (i.e. approximately 2 years). Pair dissolution was mostly human-related, primarily caused by legal control actions (36·7%), verified poaching (9·2%) and traffic-related causes (2·1%). Intrinsic factors, such as disease and age, accounted for only 7·7% of pair dissolutions. The remaining 44·3% of dissolution events were from unknown causes, but we argue that a large portion could be explained by an additional source of human-caused mortality, cryptic poaching. Extrinsic population factors, such as variables describing the geographical location of the pair, had a stronger effect on risk of pair dissolution compared to anthropogenic landscape characteristics. Population intrinsic factors, such as the inbreeding coefficient of the male pair member, had a negative effect on pair bond duration. The mechanism behind this result remains unknown, but might be explained by lower survival of inbred males or more complex inbreeding effects mediated by behaviour. Our study provides quantitative estimates of breeder bond duration in a social carnivore and highlights the effect of extrinsic (i.e. anthropogenic) and intrinsic factors (i.e. inbreeding) involved in wolf pair bond duration. Unlike the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that are commonly reported on individual survival or population growth, here we provide quantitative estimates of their potential effect on the social unit of the population, the wolf pair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.