Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27559337›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Metabolic Reconstruction of Setaria italica: A Systems Biology Approach for Integrating Tissue-Specific Omics and Pathway Analysis of Bioenergy Grasses.

Cristiana G de Oliveira Dal'Molin, Camila Orellana, Leigh Gebbie, Jennifer Steen, Mark P Hodson, Panagiotis Chrysanthopoulos, Manuel R Plan, Richard McQualter, Robin W Palfreyman, Lars K Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Non-canonical plant metabolism.Nature plants · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The potentialities of omics resources for millet improvement.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Multi-omics intervention inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cristiana G de Oliveira Dal'MolinCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Camila OrellanaCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Leigh GebbieCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jennifer SteenCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mark P HodsonCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia; Metabolomics Australia, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia.
Panagiotis ChrysanthopoulosCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia; Metabolomics Australia, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia.
Manuel R PlanCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia; Metabolomics Australia, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, QLD, Australia.
Richard McQualterCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Robin W PalfreymanCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lars K NielsenCentre for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urgent need for major gains in industrial crops productivity and in biofuel production from bioenergy grasses have reinforced attention on understanding C4 photosynthesis. Systems biology studies of C4 model plants may reveal important features of C4 metabolism. Here we chose foxtail millet (Setaria italica), as a C4 model plant and developed protocols to perform systems biology studies. As part of the systems approach, we have developed and used a genome-scale metabolic reconstruction in combination with the use of multi-omics technologies to gain more insights into the metabolism of S. italica. mRNA, protein, and metabolite abundances, were measured in mature and immature stem/leaf phytomers, and the multi-omics data were integrated into the metabolic reconstruction framework to capture key metabolic features in different developmental stages of the plant. RNA-Seq reads were mapped to the S. italica resulting for 83% coverage of the protein coding genes of S. italica. Besides revealing similarities and differences in central metabolism of mature and immature tissues, transcriptome analysis indicates significant gene expression of two malic enzyme isoforms (NADP- ME and NAD-ME). Although much greater expression levels of NADP-ME genes are observed and confirmed by the correspondent protein abundances in the samples, the expression of multiple genes combined to the significant abundance of metabolites that participates in C4 metabolism of NAD-ME and NADP-ME subtypes suggest that S. italica may use mixed decarboxylation modes of C4 photosynthetic pathways under different plant developmental stages. The overall analysis also indicates different levels of regulation in mature and immature tissues in carbon fixation, glycolysis, TCA cycle, amino acids, fatty acids, lignin, and cellulose syntheses. Altogether, the multi-omics analysis reveals different biological entities and their interrelation and regulation over plant development. With this study, we demonstrated that this systems approach is powerful enough to complement the functional metabolic annotation of bioenergy grasses.

Indexed as

bioenergy grassesC4 photosynthesismetabolic reconstructionomicsplant systems biologySetaria italica

Identifiers

PMID27559337
PMCPMC4978736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.