Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558875›Full record

ArticleJournal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A2016

Pulmonary exposure to cellulose nanocrystals caused deleterious effects to reproductive system in male mice.

Mariana T Farcas, Elena R Kisin, Autumn L Menas, Dmitriy W Gutkin, Alexander Star, Richard S Reiner, Naveena Yanamala, Kai Savolainen, Anna A Shvedova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nanocelluloses - Nanotoxicology, Safety Aspects and 3D Bioprinting.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Nanocellulose Bio-Based Composites for Food Packaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Engineered nanomaterial-induced lysosomal membrane permeabilization and anti-cathepsin agents.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariana T Farcasa Exposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
Elena R Kisina Exposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
Autumn L Menasa Exposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
Dmitriy W Gutkinb Department of Pathology , University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA.
Alexander Starc Department of Chemistry , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania , USA.
Richard S Reinerd Forest Products Laboratory , USDA Forest Service , Madison , Wisconsin , USA.
Naveena Yanamalaa Exposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
Kai Savolainene Finnish Institute of Occupational Health , Helsinki , Finland.
Anna A Shvedovaa Exposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC , Morgantown , West Virginia , USA.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIForest Products Laboratory · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWest Virginia University Hospitals · US

Funding

Investigations and Mitigation of Carbon Nanomaterial ToxicityR01ES019304 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STAR, ALEXANDER · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past several years there has been an increased number of applications of cellulosic materials in many sectors, including the food industry, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. However, to date, there are few studies investigating the potential adverse effects of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). The objective of this study was to determine long-term outcomes on the male reproductive system of mice upon repeated pharyngeal aspiration exposure to CNC. To achieve this, cauda epididymal sperm samples were analyzed for sperm concentration, motility, morphological abnormalities, and DNA damage. Testicular and epididymal oxidative damage was evaluated, as well as histopathology examination of testes. In addition, changes in levels of testosterone in testes and serum and of luteinizing hormone (LH) in serum were determined. Three months after the last administration, CNC exposure significantly altered sperm concentration, motility, cell morphology, and sperm DNA integrity. These parameters correlated with elevated proinflammatory cytokines levels and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in testes, as well as oxidative stress in both testes and epididymis. Exposure to CNC also produced damage to testicular structure, as evidenced by presence of interstitial edema, frequent dystrophic seminiferous tubules with arrested spermatogenesis and degenerating spermatocytes, and imbalance in levels of testosterone and LH. Taken together, these results demonstrate that pulmonary exposure to CNC induces sustained adverse effects in spermatocytes/spermatozoa, suggesting male reproductive toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCelluloseDNA DamageEpididymisInhalation ExposureLuteinizing HormoneMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesSpermatozoaSperm CountTestosteroneCelluloseLuteinizing HormoneTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID27558875
PMCPMC5053892
OpenAlexW2512002741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.