Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558858›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2016

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients after Initiation of a New Biologic Agent: Trajectories of Disease Activity in a Large Multinational Cohort Study.

D S Courvoisier, D Alpizar-Rodriguez, J E Gottenberg, M V Hernandez, F Iannone, E Lie, M J Santos, K Pavelka, C Turesson, X Mariette and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

D S CourvoisierUniversity Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: Delphine.Courvoisier@hcuge.ch.
D Alpizar-RodriguezUniversity Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland.
J E GottenbergStrasbourg University Hospital, France.
M V HernandezHospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain.
F IannoneRheumatology Unit, University Hospital, Bari, Italy.
E LieDiakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
M J SantosRheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisbon, Portugal.
K PavelkaInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.
C TuressonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
X MarietteHôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, France.
D ChoquetteInstitut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, CHUM, Canada.
M L HetlandThe DANBIO registry Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
A FinckhUniversity Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often heterogeneous. We aimed to identify types of disease activity trajectories following the initiation of a new biologic DMARD (bDMARD).

methodsPooled analysis of nine national registries of patients with diagnosis of RA, who initiated Abatacept and had at least two measures of disease activity (DAS28). We used growth mixture models to identify groups of patients with similar courses of treatment response, and examined these patients' characteristics and effectiveness outcomes.

findingsWe identified three types of treatment response trajectories: 'gradual responders' (GR; 3576 patients, 91·7%) had a baseline mean DAS28 of 4·1 and progressive improvement over time; 'rapid responders' (RR; 219 patients, 5·6%) had higher baseline DAS28 and rapid improvement in disease activity; 'inadequate responders' (IR; 103 patients, 2·6%) had high DAS28 at baseline (5·1) and progressive worsening in disease activity. They were similar in baseline characteristics. Drug discontinuation for ineffectiveness was shorter among inadequate responders (p=0.03), and EULAR good or moderate responses at 1year was much higher among 'rapid responders' (p<0.001).

interpretationClinical information and baseline clinical characteristics do not allow a reliable prediction of which trajectory the patients will follow after bDMARD initiation.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological FactorsBiomarkersComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological FactorsBiomarkersAbataceptDAS28Disease activityDrug retentionLongitudinal dataResponse rateRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID27558858
PMCPMC5049989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.