Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558777›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Quantitative proteomic comparison of stationary/G0 phase cells and tetrads in budding yeast.

Ravinder Kumar, Sanjeeva Srivastava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cellular quiescence in budding yeast.Yeast (Chichester, England) · 2021
    Review
  11. Metabolic switches from quiescence to growth in synchronized Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ravinder KumarDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400076, Maharashtra, India.
Sanjeeva SrivastavaDepartment of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400076, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of the microbial cells on earth under natural conditions exist in a dormant condition, commonly known as quiescent state. Quiescent cells exhibit low rates of transcription and translation suggesting that cellular abundance of proteins may be similar in quiescent cells. Therefore, this study aim to compare the proteome of budding yeast cells from two quiescent states viz. stationary phase/G0 and tetrads. Using iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation) based quantitative proteomics we identified 289 proteins, among which around 40 proteins exhibited ±1.5 fold change consistently from the four biological replicates. Proteomics data was validated by western blot and denstiometric analysis of Hsp12 and Spg4. Level of budding yeast 14-3-3 proteins was found to be similar in both the quiescent states, whereas Hsp12 and Spg4 expressed only during stress. FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis showed that budding yeast cells were arrested at G1 stages both in tetrads as well as in stationary phase. We also observed that quiescent states did not express Ime1 (inducer of meiosis). Taken together, our present study demonstrates that the cells in quiescent state may have similar proteome, and accumulation of proteins like Hsp12, Hsp26, and Spg4 may play an important role in retaining viability of the cells during dormancy.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsFlow CytometryGene Expression Regulation, FungalHeat-Shock ProteinsMeiosisNuclear ProteinsOsmotic PressureProteomicsResting Phase, Cell CycleSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSpores, FungalTranscription Factors14-3-3 ProteinsBMH1 protein, S cerevisiaeBMH2 protein, S cerevisiaeHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP12 protein, S cerevisiaeHSP26 protein, S cerevisiaeIME1 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27558777
PMCPMC4997312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.