Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558662›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2017

An assessment of the variation in the concentration of acetylcysteine in infusions for the treatment of paracetamol overdose.

George P Bailey, David M Wood, John R H Archer, Edmund Rab, Robert J Flanagan, Paul I Dargan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Intravenous Acetylcysteine: What Should Replace the Prescott "Three-Bag" Protocol?Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

George P BaileyClinical Toxicology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
David M WoodClinical Toxicology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
John R H ArcherClinical Toxicology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Edmund RabToxicology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Robert J FlanaganToxicology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Paul I DarganClinical Toxicology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Health Partners, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravenous acetylcysteine is the treatment of choice for paracetamol poisoning. A previous UK study in 2001 found that 39% of measured acetylcysteine infusion concentrations differed by >20% from anticipated concentrations. In 2012, the UK Commission on Human Medicines made recommendations for the management of paracetamol overdose, including provision of weight-based acetylcysteine dosing tables. The aim of this study was to assess variation in acetylcysteine concentrations in administered infusions following the introduction of this guidance.

methodsA 6-month single-centre prospective study was undertaken at a UK teaching hospital. After preparation, 5-ml samples were taken from the first, second and third/any subsequent acetylcysteine infusions. Acetylcysteine was measured in diluted (1:50) samples by high-performance liquid chromatography. Comparisons between measured and expected concentrations based on prescribed weight-based dose and volume were made for each infusion.

resultsNinety samples were collected. There was a variation of ≤10% in measured compared to expected concentration for 45 (50%) infusions, of 10-20% for 27 (30%) infusions, 20.1-50% for 14 (16%) infusions and >50% for four (4%) infusions. There was a median (interquartile range) variation in measured compared to expected concentration of -3.6 mg ml

conclusionThere has been a moderate improvement in the variation in acetylcysteine dose administered by infusion. Further work is required to understand the continuing variation and consideration should be given to simplification of acetylcysteine regimes to decrease the risk of administration errors.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAcetylcysteineAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAntidotesChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDrug OverdoseHospitals, TeachingHumansInfusions, IntravenousProspective StudiesUnited KingdomAcetaminophenAcetylcysteineAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAntidotesacetaminophenacetylcysteinedrug overdoseintravenous infusionsmedication errorsparacetamol

Identifiers

PMID27558662
PMCPMC5237694
OpenAlexW2514744876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.