ArticleNeurology2016
Report of a workshop on research gaps in the treatment of cerebral palsy.
Article in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assisted cycling in non-ambulant adults with cerebral palsy: exploratory effects and feasibility in residential care.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-Collaborator Engagement to Identify Research Priorities for Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Involving people with lived experience when setting cerebral palsy research priorities: A scoping review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Unplanned hospital readmission after cholecystectomy in adults with cerebral palsy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- The critical need to accelerate cerebral palsy research with consumer engagement, global networks, and adaptive designs.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Navigating the complex care landscape: Addressing challenges and advancing adult care frameworks for individuals with cerebral palsy.Health care transitions · 2024Article
- Epilepsy and proxy-reported health-related quality of life in children and young people with non-ambulatory cerebral palsy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Article
- A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of Motor Learning in Preschoolers and Children over the Last 15 Years.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Motivators and barriers to research participation for individuals with cerebral palsy and their families.PloS one · 2022Article
- Cerebral Palsy Research Network Clinical Registry: Methodology and Baseline Report.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2020Article
- Cerebral palsy in Canada, 2011-2031: results of a microsimulation modelling study of epidemiological and cost impacts.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020Article
- Stem cells and cell-based therapies for cerebral palsy: a call for rigor.Pediatric research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is heterogeneous in etiology and manifestations, making research into relevant therapies difficult and limiting the generalizability of the results. We report here on the NIH CP symposium, where stakeholders from academic, clinical, regulatory, and advocacy backgrounds discussed the major challenges and needs for moving forward with clinical research in CP, and outlined priorities and action items. New information is constantly generated through research into pathogenesis and etiology. Clinical research and new therapeutic approaches need to keep pace, through large data registry integration and new research designs. Development of standardized data collection, increasing academic focus on CP research, and iterative approaches to treatment throughout the patients' lives, have all been identified as areas of focus. The workshop identified critical gaps and areas of focus to increase the evidence base for therapeutic approaches to determine which treatments work best for which patients in the near future. These include consolidation and optimization of databases and registries, updates to the research methodology, and better integration of resources and stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.