Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558372›Full record

ArticleNeurology2016

NALCN channelopathies: Distinguishing gain-of-function and loss-of-function mutations.

Eric G Bend, Yue Si, David A Stevenson, Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir, Tara M Newcomb, Erik M Jorgensen, Kathryn J Swoboda

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Modelling phenotypes, variants and pathomechanisms of syndromic diseases in different systems.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Case Report: AFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  14. NaJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric G BendFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Yue SiFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
David A StevensonFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Pinar Bayrak-ToydemirFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Tara M NewcombFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Erik M JorgensenFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. kswoboda@mgh.harvard.edu jorgensen@biology.utah.edu.
Kathryn J SwobodaFrom the Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (E.G.B., E.M.J.), and Department of Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (Y.S., P.B.-T.), Salt Lake City, UT; Division of Medical Genetics (D.A.S.), Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurology (T.M.N.), Pediatric Motor Disorders Research Program, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; and Department of Neurology (K.J.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. kswoboda@mgh.harvard.edu jorgensen@biology.utah.edu.
ARUP Laboratories (United States) · USARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental PathologyMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

SYNAPTIC FUNCTION IN THE NEMATODE C. ELEGANSR01NS034307 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JORGENSEN, ERIK M · 1995 to 2024
$5.8M
Newborn screening for identification & prospective followup of infants with SMAR01HD069045 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SWOBODA, KATHRYN J. · 2011 to 2015
$4.3M
ACL HHS U01DD001108NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069045NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo perform genotype-phenotype analysis in an infant with congenital arthrogryposis due to a de novo missense mutation in the NALCN ion channel and explore the mechanism of pathogenicity using a Caenorhabditis elegans model.

methodsWe performed whole-exome sequencing in a preterm neonate with congenital arthrogryposis and a severe life-threatening clinical course. We examined the mechanism of pathogenicity of the associated NALCN mutation by engineering the orthologous mutation into the nematode C elegans using CRISPR-Cas9.

resultsWe identified a de novo missense mutation in NALCN, c.1768C>T, in an infant with a severe neonatal lethal form of the recently characterized CLIFAHDD syndrome (congenital contractures of the limbs and face with hypotonia and developmental delay). We report novel phenotypic features including prolonged episodes of stimulus-sensitive sustained muscular contraction associated with life-threatening episodes of desaturation and autonomic instability, extending the severity of previously described phenotypes associated with mutations in NALCN. When engineered into the C elegans ortholog, this mutation results in a severe gain-of-function phenotype, with hypercontraction and uncoordinated movement. We engineered 6 additional CLIFAHDD syndrome mutations into C elegans and the mechanism of action could be divided into 2 categories: half phenocopied gain-of-function mutants and half phenocopied loss-of-function mutants.

conclusionsThe clinical phenotype of our patient and electrophysiologic studies show sustained muscular contraction in response to transient sensory stimuli. In C elegans, this mutation causes neuronal hyperactivity via a gain-of-function NALCN ion channel. Testing human variants of NALCN in C elegans demonstrates that CLIFAHDD can be caused by dominant loss- or gain-of-function mutations in ion channel function.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAbnormalities, MultipleAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsChannelopathiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIon ChannelsMembrane ProteinsModels, AnimalPhenotypeSodium ChannelsSyndromeCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsIon ChannelsMembrane ProteinsNALCN protein, C elegansNALCN protein, humanSodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID27558372
PMCPMC5027803
OpenAlexW2510063199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.