Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558240›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2016

Promoting good policy for leadership and governance of health related rehabilitation: a realist synthesis.

Joanne McVeigh, Malcolm MacLachlan, Brynne Gilmore, Chiedza McClean, Arne H Eide, Hasheem Mannan, Priscille Geiser, Antony Duttine, Gubela Mji, Eilish McAuliffe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Governance of noncommunicable diseases in Afghanistan.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Joanne McVeighCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Malcolm MacLachlanCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland. malcolm.maclachlan@tcd.ie.
Brynne GilmoreCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Chiedza McCleanCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Arne H EideCentre for Rehabilitation Studies, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Stellenbosch University, P.O. Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa.
Hasheem MannanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Priscille GeiserHandicap International Fédération, 138, avenue des Frères Lumière, 69008, Lyon, France.
Antony DuttineHandicap International, 8757 Georgia Avenue, Suite 420, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA.
Gubela MjiCentre for Rehabilitation Studies, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Stellenbosch University, P.O. Box 241, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa.
Eilish McAuliffeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Beth SpruntNossal Institute for Global Health, Level 4, Alan Gilbert Building, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Mutamad AminAhfad University for Women, P.O. Box 167, Omdurman, Sudan.
Charles NormandCentre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGood governance may result in strengthened performance of a health system. Coherent policies are essential for good health system governance. The overall aim of this research is to provide the best available scientific evidence on principles of good policy related leadership and governance of health related rehabilitation services in less resourced settings. This research was also conducted to support development of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Guidelines on health related rehabilitation.

methodsAn innovative study design was used, comprising two methods: a systematic search and realist synthesis of literature, and a Delphi survey of expert stakeholders to refine and triangulate findings from the realist synthesis. In accordance with Pawson and Tilley's approach to realist synthesis, we identified context mechanism outcome pattern configurations (CMOCs) from the literature. Subsequently, these CMOCs were developed into statements for the Delphi survey, whereby 18 expert stakeholders refined these statements to achieve consensus on recommendations for policy related governance of health related rehabilitation.

resultsSeveral broad principles emerged throughout formulation of recommendations: participation of persons with disabilities in policy processes to improve programme responsiveness, efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability, and to strengthen service-user self-determination and satisfaction; collection of disaggregated disability statistics to support political momentum, decision-making of policymakers, evaluation, accountability, and equitable allocation of resources; explicit promotion in policies of access to services for all subgroups of persons with disabilities and service-users to support equitable and accessible services; robust inter-sectoral coordination to cultivate coherent mandates across governmental departments regarding service provision; and 'institutionalizing' programmes by aligning them with preexisting Ministerial models of healthcare to support programme sustainability.

conclusionsAlongside national policymakers, our policy recommendations are relevant for several stakeholders, including service providers and service-users. This research aims to provide broad policy recommendations, rather than a strict formula, in acknowledgement of contextual diversity and complexity. Accordingly, our study proposes general principles regarding optimal policy related governance of health related rehabilitation in less resourced settings, which may be valuable across diverse health systems and contexts.

Indexed as

LeadershipGovernment ProgramsHealth PolicyHumansPersons with DisabilitiesRehabilitationDelphi studyGovernanceHealth related rehabilitationLeadershipLess resourced settingsPolicyRealist synthesis

Identifiers

PMID27558240
PMCPMC4997679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.