Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558180›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Chlorhexidine and Mupirocin Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA Trial.

Mary K Hayden, Karen Lolans, Katherine Haffenreffer, Taliser R Avery, Ken Kleinman, Haiying Li, Rebecca E Kaganov, Julie Lankiewicz, Julia Moody, Edward Septimus and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00980980 (Cluster Randomized Trial of Hospitals to Assess Impact of Targeted Versus Universal), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00980980 nacompletednot on this map

Cluster Randomized Trial of Hospitals to Assess Impact of Targeted Versus Universal

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard Pilgrim Health CareRan2009 to 2011Enrolled74,256ConditionsMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus AureusArmsChlorhexidine bath and nasal mupirocin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mupirocin-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Increase in imported mupirocin-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Distribution ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A tale of two intensive care units (ICUs): BaselineInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Mary K HaydenDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA mhayden@rush.edu.
Karen LolansDepartment of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Katherine HaffenrefferDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Taliser R AveryDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ken KleinmanDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Haiying LiDepartment of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rebecca E KaganovDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julie LankiewiczDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julia MoodyHospital Corporation of America, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Edward SeptimusDivision of Internal Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Robert A WeinsteinDepartment of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jason HickokHospital Corporation of America, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
John JerniganOffice of HAI Prevention Research and Evaluation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jonathan B PerlinHospital Corporation of America, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Richard PlattDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan S HuangDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of California-Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, USA.
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care · USHarvard University · USHCA Healthcare · USRush University Medical Center · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCook County Health and Hospitals System · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Eastern Massachusetts Prevention Epicenters Program IIU01CI000344 · CI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI PLATT, RICHARD · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NCPDCID CDC HHS U01 CI000344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether targeted or universal decolonization strategies for the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) select for resistance to decolonizing agents is unresolved. The REDUCE-MRSA trial (ClinicalTrials registration no. NCT00980980) provided an opportunity to investigate this question. REDUCE-MRSA was a 3-arm, cluster-randomized trial of either screening and isolation without decolonization, targeted decolonization with chlorhexidine and mupirocin, or universal decolonization without screening to prevent MRSA infection in intensive-care unit (ICU) patients. Isolates from the baseline and intervention periods were collected and tested for susceptibility to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) by microtiter dilution; mupirocin susceptibility was tested by Etest. The presence of the qacA or qacB gene was determined by PCR and DNA sequence analysis. A total of 3,173 isolates were analyzed; 2 were nonsusceptible to CHG (MICs, 8 μg/ml), and 5/814 (0.6%) carried qacA or qacB At baseline, 7.1% of MRSA isolates expressed low-level mupirocin resistance, and 7.5% expressed high-level mupirocin resistance. In a mixed-effects generalized logistic regression model, the odds of mupirocin resistance among clinical MRSA isolates or MRSA isolates acquired in an ICU in intervention versus baseline periods did not differ across arms, although estimates were imprecise due to small numbers. Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine and carriage of qacA or qacB were rare among MRSA isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA trial. The odds of mupirocin resistance were no different in the intervention versus baseline periods across arms, but the confidence limits were broad, and the results should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCarrier StateChlorhexidineGenes, BacterialHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMupirocinPolymerase Chain ReactionSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineMupirocin

Identifiers

PMID27558180
PMCPMC5078551
OpenAlexW2512525552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.