Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27558094›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2016

The cell fate: senescence or quiescence.

Menderes Yusuf Terzi, Muzeyyen Izmirli, Bulent Gogebakan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Menderes Yusuf TerziDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Serinyol Campus, 31034, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey.
Muzeyyen IzmirliDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Serinyol Campus, 31034, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey. muzeyyenizmirli@gmail.com.
Bulent GogebakanDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Serinyol Campus, 31034, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senescence and quiescence are frequently used as interchangeable terms in the literature unwittingly. Despite the fact that common molecules play role in decision of cell cycle arrest, senescent and quiescent cells have some distinctive phenotypes at both molecular and morphological levels. Thus, in this review we summarized the features of senescence and quiescence with respect to visual characteristics and prominent key molecules. A PubMed research was conducted for the key words; "senescence", "quiescence" and "cell cycle arrest". The results which are related to cell cycle control were selected. The selection criteria of the target articles used for this review included also key cell cycle molecules such as p53, pRB, p21, p16, mTOR, p27, etc. The results were not evaluated statistically. The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been claimed to be key molecule in switching on/off senescence/quiescence. Specifically, although maximal p53 activation blocks mTOR and causes quiescence, partial p53 activation sustains mTOR activity and causes senescence subsequently. In broader perspective, quiescence occurs due to lack of nutrition and growth factors whereas senescence takes place due to aging and serious DNA damages. Contrary to quiescence, senescence is a degenerative process ensuing a certain cell death. We highlighted several differences between senescence and quiescence and their key molecules in this review. Whereas quiescence (cell cycle arrest) is only one half of the senescence, the other half is growth stimulation which causes actual senescence phenotype.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle CheckpointsCellular SenescenceAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansSignal TransductionStem CellsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53TOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53mTORp53QuiescenceSenescence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.