Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27557894›Full record

ArticleNature communications2016

Sensory input attenuation allows predictive sexual response in yeast.

Alvaro Banderas, Mihaly Koltai, Alexander Anders, Victor Sourjik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pheromone Response and Mating Behavior in Fission Yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  6. Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner inMolecular biology of the cell · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Autonomous and Assisted Control for Synthetic Microbiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alvaro BanderasMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology &LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 16, D-35037 Marburg, Germany.
Mihaly KoltaiMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology &LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 16, D-35037 Marburg, Germany.
Alexander AndersMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology &LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 16, D-35037 Marburg, Germany.
Victor SourjikMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology &LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 16, D-35037 Marburg, Germany.
Loewe Center for Synthetic Microbiology · DEMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology · DE

Funding

European Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals are known to adjust their sexual behaviour depending on mate competition. Here we report similar regulation for mating behaviour in a sexual unicellular eukaryote, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We demonstrate that pheromone-based communication between the two mating types, coupled to input attenuation by recipient cells, enables yeast to robustly monitor relative mate abundance (sex ratio) within a mixed population and to adjust their commitment to sexual reproduction in proportion to their estimated chances of successful mating. The mechanism of sex-ratio sensing relies on the diffusible peptidase Bar1, which is known to degrade the pheromone signal produced by mating partners. We further show that such a response to sexual competition within a population can optimize the fitness trade-off between the costs and benefits of mating response induction. Our study thus provides an adaptive explanation for the known molecular mechanism of pheromone degradation in yeast.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPheromonesReproductionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsPheromonesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27557894
PMCPMC5007329
OpenAlexW2516869271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.