ArticleJournal of human genetics2017
Estimation of the risk of a qualitative phenotype: dependence on population risk.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual disease risk estimated based on the data from single or multiple genetic loci is generally calculated using the genotypes of a subject, frequencies of alleles of interest, odds ratios and the average population risk. However, it is often difficult to estimate accurately the average population risk, and therefore it is often expressed as an interval. To better estimate the risk of a subject with given genotypes, we built R scripts using the R environment and constructed graphs to examine the change in the estimated risk as well as the relative risk according to the change of the average population risk. In most cases, the graph of the relative risk did not cross the line of y=1, thereby indicating that the order of the relative risk for given genotypes and the population average risk does not change when the average risk increases or decreases. In rare cases, however, the graph of the relative risk crossed the line of y=1, thereby indicating that the order of the relative risk for given genotypes and the population average risk does change owing to the change in the population risk. We propose that the relative risk should be estimated for not only the point average population risk but also for an interval of the average population risk. Moreover, when the graph crosses the line of y=1 within the interval, this information should be reported to the consumer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27557667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.