Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27557667›Full record

ArticleJournal of human genetics2017

Estimation of the risk of a qualitative phenotype: dependence on population risk.

Naoyuki Kamatani, Shigeo Kamitsuji, Yasuaki Akazawa, Takashi Kido, Masanori Akita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naoyuki KamataniDepartment of Data Analysis, StaGen, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeo KamitsujiDepartment of Data Analysis, StaGen, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuaki AkazawaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Bioscience School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KidoRiken Genesis, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanori AkitaMTI, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual disease risk estimated based on the data from single or multiple genetic loci is generally calculated using the genotypes of a subject, frequencies of alleles of interest, odds ratios and the average population risk. However, it is often difficult to estimate accurately the average population risk, and therefore it is often expressed as an interval. To better estimate the risk of a subject with given genotypes, we built R scripts using the R environment and constructed graphs to examine the change in the estimated risk as well as the relative risk according to the change of the average population risk. In most cases, the graph of the relative risk did not cross the line of y=1, thereby indicating that the order of the relative risk for given genotypes and the population average risk does not change when the average risk increases or decreases. In rare cases, however, the graph of the relative risk crossed the line of y=1, thereby indicating that the order of the relative risk for given genotypes and the population average risk does change owing to the change in the population risk. We propose that the relative risk should be estimated for not only the point average population risk but also for an interval of the average population risk. Moreover, when the graph crosses the line of y=1 within the interval, this information should be reported to the consumer.

Indexed as

AllelesData Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeAlgorithmsGenomeHumansOdds RatioPhenotypeRisk

Identifiers

PMID27557667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.