Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27557531›Full record

Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2016

Psychological distress in medical patients 30 days following an emergency department admission: results from a prospective, observational study.

Lukas Faessler, Alexander Kutz, Sebastian Haubitz, Beat Mueller, Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello, Philipp Schuetz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01768494 (Optimizing Triage and Hospitalisation In Adult General Medical Emergency Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01768494 completednot on this map

Optimizing Triage and Hospitalisation In Adult General Medical Emergency Patients: the TRIAGE Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2013 to 2014Enrolled7,000ConditionsEmergencies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas FaesslerInstitute of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. lukas.faessler@gmx.net.
Alexander KutzUniversity Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Sebastian HaubitzUniversity Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Beat MuellerUniversity Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Pasqualina Perrig-ChielloInstitute of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Philipp SchuetzUniversity Department of Internal Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
Kantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress in medical patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) is not well studied. Our aim was to investigate the extent of psychological distress in a broad and unselected medical patient sample 30 days after ED admission and its association with socio-demographic and clinical variables.

methodWe used data from a prospective observational cohort study including 1575 consecutive adult medical patients presenting to the ED with acute somatic conditions. Outcome variables were patient's psychological distress measured by the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) and self-rated health assessed 30 days after ED admission using telephone interviews. Risk factors included socio-demographic variables (e.g. gender, marital status), clinical presentation (e.g. illness severity, main initial diagnosis) and course of illness (e.g. rehospitalisation, length of hospital stay).

resultsA total of 38 % of patients had evidence for psychological distress 30 days after ED admission. Multivariate analysis found female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.35, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.78), comorbid psychiatric disorder (aOR 1.63, 95 % CI 1.08 to 2.62), discharge to a post-acute care institution (aOR 1.47, 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.09), unplanned rehospitalisation (aOR 2.38, 95 % CI 1.47 to 3.86), and unplanned visit at general practitioner (aOR 4.75, 95 % CI 2.57 to 8.80) to be associated with distress at day 30 following ED admission.

conclusionsOne month after ED admission a significant number of patients still show a moderate amount of psychophysical distress. Strongest related variables were course of illness, in particular unplanned general practitioner visits. Future interventional studies should assess possibilities to reduce distress in patients at increased risk.

trial registrationNCT01768494 , January 9, 2013 (registration date), February 25, 2013 (enrolment of first participant).

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsEmergency patientsPsychological distressRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID27557531
PMCPMC4997757
OpenAlexW2515956938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.