Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27557121›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Geometrical Measures Obtained from Pretreatment Postcontrast T1 Weighted MRIs Predict Survival Benefits from Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma Patients.

David Molina, Julián Pérez-Beteta, Alicia Martínez-González, Juan M Sepúlveda, Sergi Peralta, Miguel J Gil-Gil, Gaspar Reynes, Ana Herrero, Ramón De Las Peñas, Raquel Luque and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Correlation of radiological and immunochemical parameters with clinical outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with Bevacizumab.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

David MolinaLaboratory of Mathematical Oncology (MôLAB), Instituto de Matemática Aplicada a la Ciencia y la Ingeniería, Edificio Politécnico, Avda. Camilo José Cela 3, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-3894
Julián Pérez-BetetaLaboratory of Mathematical Oncology (MôLAB), Instituto de Matemática Aplicada a la Ciencia y la Ingeniería, Edificio Politécnico, Avda. Camilo José Cela 3, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.
Alicia Martínez-GonzálezLaboratory of Mathematical Oncology (MôLAB), Instituto de Matemática Aplicada a la Ciencia y la Ingeniería, Edificio Politécnico, Avda. Camilo José Cela 3, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.
Juan M SepúlvedaMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Sergi PeraltaMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain.
Miguel J Gil-GilMedical Oncology Service, Institut Catalá d'Oncologia IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Gaspar ReynesMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ana HerreroMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ramón De Las PeñasMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Raquel LuqueMedical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Jaume CapelladesNeuroradiology Section. Radiology Service. Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen BalañaMedical Oncology Service, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IGTP, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Víctor M Pérez-GarcíaLaboratory of Mathematical Oncology (MôLAB), Instituto de Matemática Aplicada a la Ciencia y la Ingeniería, Edificio Politécnico, Avda. Camilo José Cela 3, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESFundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiangiogenic therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) such as bevacizumab (BVZ), have been unable to extend survival in large patient cohorts. However, a subset of patients having angiogenesis-dependent tumors might benefit from these therapies. Currently, there are no biomarkers allowing to discriminate responders from non-responders before the start of the therapy.

methods40 patients from the randomized GENOM009 study complied the inclusion criteria (quality of images, clinical data available). Of those, 23 patients received first line temozolomide (TMZ) for eight weeks and then concomitant radiotherapy and TMZ. 17 patients received BVZ+TMZ for seven weeks and then added radiotherapy to the treatment. Clinical variables were collected, tumors segmented and several geometrical measures computed including: Contrast enhancing (CE), necrotic, and total volumes; equivalent spherical CE width; several geometric measures of the CE 'rim' geometry and a set of image texture measures. The significance of the results was studied using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. Correlations were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients.

resultsKaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that total, CE and inner volume (p = 0.019, HR = 4.258) and geometric heterogeneity of the CE areas (p = 0.011, HR = 3.931) were significant parameters identifying response to BVZ. The group of patients with either regular CE areas (small geometric heterogeneity, median difference survival 15.88 months, p = 0.011) or those with small necrotic volume (median survival difference 14.50 months, p = 0.047) benefited substantially from BVZ.

conclusionImaging biomarkers related to the irregularity of contrast enhancing areas and the necrotic volume were able to discriminate GBM patients with a substantial survival benefit from BVZ. A prospective study is needed to validate our results.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkersBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27557121
PMCPMC4996463
OpenAlexW2515051287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.