Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27557104›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2016

Simulation Neurotechnologies for Advancing Brain Research: Parallelizing Large Networks in NEURON.

William W Lytton, Alexandra H Seidenstein, Salvador Dura-Bernal, Robert A McDougal, Felix Schürmann, Michael L Hines

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tutorial: using NEURON for neuromechanical simulations.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Geppetto: a reusable modular open platform for exploring neuroscience data and models.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William W LyttonDepartments of Physiology, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn 11023, New York, and Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn 11203, New York, U.S.A. bill.lytton@downstate.edu.
Alexandra H SeidensteinDepartments of Physiology, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11023, and Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. aseidenstein@icloud.com.
Salvador Dura-BernalDepartments of Physiology, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering, and Neurology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11023, U.S.A. salvadordura@gmail.com.
Robert A McDougalDepartment of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, U.S.A. robert.mcdougal@yale.edu.
Felix SchürmannBlue Brain Project, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Geneva, Switzerland felix.schuermann@epfl.ch.
Michael L HinesBlue Brain Project, Brain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Geneva, Switzerland, and Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, U.S.A. michael.hines@yale.edu.

Funding

MEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH TRAINING AT YALET15LM007056 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Bender Gerstein, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 1987 to 2026
$22.2M
COMPUTER METHODS FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMSR01NS011613 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL L HINES, Robert A. McDougal · 1985 to 2026
$10.4M
Extension of NEURON simulator for simulation of reaction-diffusion in neuronsR01MH086638 · NIMH · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W, MCDOUGAL, ROBERT A. · 2010 to 2025
$6.0M
Microconnectomics of neocortex: a multiscale computer modelU01EB017695 · NIBIB · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI LYTTON, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB017695NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086638NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS011613NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large multiscale neuronal network simulations are of increasing value as more big data are gathered about brain wiring and organization under the auspices of a current major research initiative, such as Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies. The development of these models requires new simulation technologies. We describe here the current use of the NEURON simulator with message passing interface (MPI) for simulation in the domain of moderately large networks on commonly available high-performance computers (HPCs). We discuss the basic layout of such simulations, including the methods of simulation setup, the run-time spike-passing paradigm, and postsimulation data storage and data management approaches. Using the Neuroscience Gateway, a portal for computational neuroscience that provides access to large HPCs, we benchmark simulations of neuronal networks of different sizes (500-100,000 cells), and using different numbers of nodes (1-256). We compare three types of networks, composed of either Izhikevich integrate-and-fire neurons (I&F), single-compartment Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) cells, or a hybrid network with half of each. Results show simulation run time increased approximately linearly with network size and decreased almost linearly with the number of nodes. Networks with I&F neurons were faster than HH networks, although differences were small since all tested cells were point neurons with a single compartment.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsBrainComputer SimulationHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeurons

Identifiers

PMID27557104
PMCPMC5295685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.