ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2017
Team Mentoring for Interdisciplinary Team Science: Lessons From K12 Scholars and Directors.
Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Bridging the gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice excellence: The role of mentorship.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Building capacity in dissemination and implementation research: the presence and impact of advice networks.Implementation science : IS · 2024Article
- The development and evaluation of a short-term international student research and educational program.International journal of nursing sciences · 2024Article
- Learning to Prioritize Our Collaborative Opportunities: Overcoming the Bright Shiny Object Syndrome.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2023Article
- Team principles for successful interdisciplinary research teams.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Developing Researchers with Expertise in Sex as a Biological Variable through SCORE Career Enhancement Core Center Programs.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Integrative approaches to methods training for early-career scientists: Rationale and process evaluation of the first cohort of the Michigan Integrative Well-Being and Inequality Training Program.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Establishing an interdisciplinary research team for cardio-oncology artificial intelligence informatics precision and health equity.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Strengthened through Diversity: A Blueprint for Organizational Change.Annals of neurology · 2021Article
- Caution Before Embracing Team Mentoring in Academic Medical Research Training: Recommendations from a Qualitative Study.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021Article
- A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges.Health research policy and systems · 2020Review
- Mentored training and its association with dissemination and implementation research output: a quasi-experimental evaluation.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Mentorship in Medicine and Other Health Professions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Review
- Organizational and training factors that promote team science: A qualitative analysis and application of theory to the National Institutes of Health's BIRCWH career development program.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- Peer mentoring for undergraduates in a research-focused diversity initiative.Metropolitan universities · 2017Article
- Exploring Mentoring in the Context of Team Science.Mentoring & tutoring · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMentoring is critical for academic success. As science transitions to a team science model, team mentoring may have advantages. The goal of this study was to understand the process, benefits, and challenges of team mentoring relating to career development and research.
methodA national survey was conducted of Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH) program directors-current and former scholars from 27 active National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded BIRCWH NIH K12 programs-to characterize and understand the value and challenges of the team approach to mentoring. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically.
resultsResponses were received from 25/27 (93%) program directors, 78/108 (72%) current scholars, and 91/162 (56%) former scholars. Scholars reported that team mentoring was beneficial to their career development (152/169; 90%) and research (148/169; 88%). Reported advantages included a diversity of opinions, expanded networking, development of stronger study designs, and modeling of different career paths. Challenges included scheduling and managing conflicting opinions. Advice by directors offered to junior faculty entering team mentoring included the following: not to be intimidated by senior mentors, be willing to navigate conflicting advice, be proactive about scheduling and guiding discussions, have an open mind to different approaches, be explicit about expectations and mentors' roles (including importance of having a primary mentor to help navigate discussions), and meet in person as a team.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that interdisciplinary/interprofessional team mentoring has many important advantages, but that skills are required to optimally utilize multiple perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.