Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27556467›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose.

Jan Hendrik Leopold, Ameen Abu-Hanna, Camilla Colombo, Peter J Sterk, Marcus J Schultz, Lieuwe D J Bos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan Hendrik LeopoldDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands. j.h.leopold@amc.uva.nl.
Ameen Abu-HannaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands. a.abu-hanna@amc.uva.nl.
Camilla ColomboDepartment of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands. colombo.cam@gmail.com.
Peter J SterkDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands. p.j.sterk@amc.uva.nl.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands. marcus.j.schultz@gmail.com.
Lieuwe D J BosDepartment of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1100DD, The Netherlands. l.d.bos@amc.uva.nl.
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous breath analysis by electronic nose (eNose) technology in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be useful in monitoring (patho) physiological changes. However, the application of breath monitoring in a non-controlled clinical setting introduces noise into the data. We hypothesized that the sensor signal is influenced by: (1) humidity in the side-stream; (2) patient-ventilator disconnections and the nebulization of medication; and (3) changes in ventilator settings and the amount of exhaled CO₂. We aimed to explore whether the aforementioned factors introduce noise into the signal, and discuss several approaches to reduce this noise.

methodsStudy in mechanically-ventilated ICU patients. Exhaled breath was monitored using a continuous eNose with metal oxide sensors. Linear (mixed) models were used to study hypothesized associations.

resultsIn total, 1251 h of eNose data were collected. First, the initial 15 min of the signal was discarded. There was a negative association between humidity and Sensor 1 (Fixed-effect β: -0.05 ± 0.002) and a positive association with Sensors 2-4 (Fixed-effect β: 0.12 ± 0.001); the signal was corrected for this noise. Outliers were most likely due to noise and therefore removed. Sensor values were positively associated with end-tidal CO₂, tidal volume and the pressure variables. The signal was corrected for changes in these ventilator variables after which the associations disappeared.

conclusionVariations in humidity, ventilator disconnections, nebulization of medication and changes of ventilator settings indeed influenced exhaled breath signals measured in ventilated patients by continuous eNose analysis. We discussed several approaches to reduce the effects of these noise inducing variables.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseAgedBreath TestsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicRespiration, Artificialcontinuouscritical careelectronic noseexhaled breathICUmechanically-ventilatednoisepre-processing

Identifiers

PMID27556467
PMCPMC5017501
OpenAlexW2512272689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.