Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27556362›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Low-dose Actinomycin-D treatment re-establishes the tumoursuppressive function of P53 in RELA-positive ependymoma.

Theophilos Tzaridis, Till Milde, Kristian W Pajtler, Sebastian Bender, David T W Jones, Simone Müller, Andrea Wittmann, Magdalena Schlotter, Andreas E Kulozik, Peter Lichter and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The TP53 p.R337H mutation is uncommon in a Brazilian cohort of pediatric patients diagnosed with ependymoma.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Theophilos TzaridisDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Till MildeDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Children's Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristian W PajtlerDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian BenderDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
David T W JonesDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Simone MüllerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrea WittmannDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Magdalena SchlotterDivision of Molecular Genetics (B060), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas E KulozikDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Children's Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter LichterDivision of Molecular Genetics (B060), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
V Peter CollinsDivision of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK.
Olaf WittDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Children's Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcel KoolDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Andrey KorshunovClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology (G380), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan M PfisterDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hendrik WittDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology (B062), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ependymomas in children can arise throughout all compartments of the central nervous system (CNS). Highly malignant paediatric ependymoma subtypes are Group A tumours of the posterior fossa (PF-EPN-A) and RELA-fusion positive (ST-EPN-RELA) tumours in the supratentorial compartment. It was repeatedly reported in smaller series that accumulation of p53 is frequently observed in ependymomas and that immunohistochemical staining correlates with poor clinical outcome, while TP53 mutations are rare. Our TP53 mutation analysis of 130 primary ependymomas identified a mutation rate of only 3%. Immunohistochemical analysis of 398 ependymomas confirmed previous results correlating the accumulation of p53 with inferior outcome. Among the p53-positive ependymomas, the vast majority exhibited a RELA fusion leading to the hypothesis that p53 inactivation might be linked to RELA positivity.In order to assess the potential of p53 reactivation through MDM2 inhibition in ependymoma, we evaluated the effects of Actinomycin-D and Nutlin-3 treatment in two preclinical ependymoma models representing the high-risk subtypes PF-EPN-A and ST-EPN-RELA. The IC-50 of the agent as determined by metabolic activity assays was in the lower nano-molar range (0.2-0.7 nM). Transcriptome analyses of high-dose (100 nM), low-dose (5 nM) and non-treated cells revealed re-expression of p53 dependent genes including p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) after low-dose treatment. At the protein level, we validated the Actinomycin-D induced upregulation of PUMA, and of p53 interaction partners MDM2 and p21. Proapoptotic effects of low-dose application of the agent were confirmed by flow cytometry. Thus, Actinomycin-D could constitute a promising therapeutic option for ST-EPN-RELA ependymoma patients, whose tumours frequently exhibit p53 inactivation.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DactinomycinDNA Mutational AnalysisEpendymomaGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImidazolesImmunohistochemistryMedulloblastomaMiceNeuronsPiperazinesCDKN1A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21DactinomycinImidazolesMDM2 protein, humannutlin 3PiperazinesProtein Synthesis InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2RELA protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTranscription Factor RelATumor Suppressor Protein p53Actinomycin-Dependymomap53RELA

Identifiers

PMID27556362
PMCPMC5308696
OpenAlexW2509673039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.