Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27556305›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Molecular dissection of the valproic acid effects on glioma cells.

Sabine Hoja, Markus Schulze, Michael Rehli, Martin Proescholdt, Christel Herold-Mende, Peter Hau, Markus J Riemenschneider

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine HojaDepartment of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus SchulzeDepartment of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael RehliDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin ProescholdtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Christel Herold-MendeExperimental Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter HauWilhelm Sander Neuro-Oncology Unit, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus J RiemenschneiderDepartment of Neuropathology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many glioblastoma patients suffer from seizures why they are treated with antiepileptic agents. Valproic acid (VPA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that apart from its anticonvulsive effects in some retrospective studies has been suggested to lead to a superior outcome of glioblastoma patients. However, the exact molecular effects of VPA treatment on glioblastoma cells have not yet been deciphered. We treated glioblastoma cells with VPA, recorded the functional effects of this treatment and performed a global and unbiased next generation sequencing study on the chromatin (ChIP) and RNA level. 1) VPA treatment clearly sensitized glioma cells to temozolomide: A protruding VPA-induced molecular feature in this context was the transcriptional upregulation/reexpression of numerous solute carrier (SLC) transporters that was also reflected by euchromatinization on the histone level and a reexpression of SLC transporters in human biopsy samples after VPA treatment. DNA repair genes were adversely reduced. 2) VPA treatment, however, also reduced cell proliferation in temozolomide-naive cells: On the molecular level in this context we observed a transcriptional upregulation/reexpression and euchromatinization of several glioblastoma relevant tumor suppressor genes and a reduction of stemness markers, while transcriptional subtype classification (mesenchymal/proneural) remained unaltered. Taken together, these findings argue for both temozolomide-dependent and -independent effects of VPA. VPA might increase the uptake of temozolomide and simultaneously lead to a less malignant glioblastoma phenotype. From a mere molecular perspective these findings might indicate a surplus value of VPA in glioblastoma therapy and could therefore contribute an additional ratio for clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationChromatinDacarbazineDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDNA RepairGene Expression ProfilingGenes, Tumor SuppressorGlioblastomaGliomaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesHumansChromatinDacarbazineHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesRNARNA, Small InterferingTemozolomideValproic Acidbrain cancerglioblastomaHDAC inhibitorSLC transportertemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID27556305
PMCPMC5325342
OpenAlexW2507290849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.