Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27556007›Full record

ArticleApplied & translational genomics2016

Addressing ethical challenges in the Genetics Substudy of the National Eye Survey of Trinidad and Tobago (GSNESTT).

Allana N Roach, Tasanee Braithwaite, Christine Carrington, Elysse Marcellin, Subash Sharma, Aroon Hingorani, Juan P Casas, Michael A Hauser, R Rand Allingham, Samuel S Ramsewak and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied & translational genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Allana N RoachDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Tasanee BraithwaiteVision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Cambridge, UK.
Christine CarringtonDepartment of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Elysse MarcellinResearch Assistant, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Subash SharmaOptometry Programme, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Aroon HingoraniInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London (UCL), UK.
Juan P CasasInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, UK.
Michael A HauserDepartment of Medicine, Duke Institute of Molecular Physiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
R Rand AllinghamDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Samuel S RamsewakDepartment of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies (UWI), St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Rupert BourneVision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe conduct of international collaborative genomics research raises distinct ethical challenges that require special consideration, especially if conducted in settings that are research-naïve or resource-limited. Although there is considerable literature on these issues, there is a dearth of literature chronicling approaches taken to address these issues in the field. Additionally no previous ethical guidelines have been developed to support similar research in Trinidad and Tobago.

methodsA literature review was undertaken to identify strategies used to address common ethical issues relevant to human genetics and genomics research in research-naïve or resource-limited settings. Strategies identified were combined with novel approaches to develop a culturally appropriate, multifaceted strategy to address potential challenges in the Genetics Substudy of the National Eye Survey of Trinidad and Tobago (GSNESTT).

resultsRegarding the protection of study participants, we report a decision to exclude children as participants; the use of a Community Engagement and Sensitization Strategy to increase the genetic literacy of the target population; the involvement of local expertise to ensure cultural sensitivity and to address potential comprehension barriers in informed consent; and an audit of the informed consent process to ensure valid consent. Concerning the regulation of the research, we report on ethics approvals from relevant authorities; a Materials Transfer Agreement to guide sample ownership and export; and a Sample Governance Committee to oversee data use and data access. Finally regarding the protection of the interests of scientists from the host country, we report on capacity building efforts to ensure that local scientists have access to data collected through the project and appropriate recognition of their contributions in future publications.

conclusionThis paper outlines an ethical framework for the conduct of population-based genetics and genomics research in Trinidad and Tobago; highlights common issues arising in the field and strategies to address these.

Indexed as

ELSIEthicsGeneticsHuman genomicsTrinidad and Tobago

Identifiers

PMID27556007
PMCPMC4986520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.