Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27556003›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2016

Athletic Population with Spondylolysis: Review of Outcomes following Surgical Repair or Conservative Management.

Pavlos Panteliadis, Navraj S Nagra, Kimberley L Edwards, Eyal Behrbalk, Bronek Boszczyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Return to play after spondylolysis: An overview.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2021
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pavlos PanteliadisSpinal Department, Oxford University Hospitals, Headley Way, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Navraj S NagraOrthopaedic Department, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom; Division of Medical Sciences, Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, Headley Way, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kimberley L EdwardsQueen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Eyal BehrbalkThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Bronek BoszczykThe Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Queen's Medical Centre · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review.

objectiveThe study aims to critically review the outcomes associated with the surgical repair or conservative management of spondylolysis in athletes.

methodsThe English literature listed in MEDLINE/PubMed was reviewed to identify related articles using the term "spondylolysis AND athlete." The criteria for studies to be included were management of spondylolysis in athletes, English text, and no year, follow-up, or study design restrictions. The references of the retrieved articles were also evaluated. The primary outcome was time to return to sport. This search yielded 180 citations, and 25 publications were included in the review.

resultsTreatment methods were dichotomized as operative and nonoperative. In the nonoperative group, 390 athletes were included. A combination of bracing with physical therapy and restriction of activities was used. Conservative measures allowed athletes to return to sport in 3.7 months (weighted mean). One hundred seventy-four patients were treated surgically. The most common technique was Buck's, using a compression screw (91/174). All authors reported satisfactory outcomes. Time to return to play was 7.9 months (weighted mean). There were insufficient studies with suitably homogenous subgroups to conduct a meta-analysis.

conclusionThere is no gold standard approach for the management of spondylolysis in the athletic population. The existing literature suggests initial therapy should be a course of conservative management with thoracolumbosacral orthosis brace, physiotherapy, and activity modification. If conservative management fails, surgical intervention should be considered. Two-sided clinical studies are needed to determine an optimal pathway for the management of athletes with spondylolysis.

Indexed as

conservative treatmentspondylolysis in athletessurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID27556003
PMCPMC4993622
OpenAlexW2502015544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.