Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27555378›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Interactions between phasic alerting and consciousness in the fronto-striatal network.

Ana B Chica, Dimitri J Bayle, Fabiano Botta, Paolo Bartolomeo, Pedro M Paz-Alonso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Streams of conscious visual experience.Communications biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Brain Activity Associated With Expected Task Difficulty.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Contributions of the Ventral Striatum to Conscious Perception: An Intracranial EEG Study of the Attentional Blink.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana B ChicaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, and Brain, Mind, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Spain.
Dimitri J BayleSport and Movement Research Center (CeRSM, EA 2931), Université Paris Ouest-La Défense, Nanterre, France.
Fabiano BottaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, and Brain, Mind, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Spain.
Paolo BartolomeoINSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, and Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), F-75013 Paris, France.
Pedro M Paz-AlonsoBCBL, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Donostia, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESBasque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris Nanterre · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a small fraction of all the information reaching our senses can be the object of conscious report or voluntary action. Although some models propose that different attentional states (top-down amplification and vigilance) are necessary for conscious perception, few studies have explored how the brain activations associated with different attentional systems (such as top-down orienting and phasic alerting) lead to conscious perception of subsequent visual stimulation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the neural mechanisms associated with endogenous spatial attention and phasic alertness, and their interaction with the conscious perception of near-threshold stimuli. The only region demonstrating a neural interaction between endogenous attention and conscious perception was the thalamus, while a larger network of cortical and subcortical brain activations, typically associated with phasic alerting, was highly correlated with participants' conscious reports. Activation of the anterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, frontal eye fields, thalamus, and caudate nucleus was related to perceptual consciousness. These data suggest that not all attentional systems are equally effective in enhancing conscious perception, highlighting the importance of thalamo-cortical circuits on the interactions between alerting and consciousness.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionConsciousnessCorpus StriatumFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeSignal Detection, PsychologicalSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27555378
PMCPMC4995394
OpenAlexW2517916299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.