Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27555310›Full record

ArticlemBio2016

Comparative Community Proteomics Demonstrates the Unexpected Importance of Actinobacterial Glycoside Hydrolase Family 12 Protein for Crystalline Cellulose Hydrolysis.

Jennifer Hiras, Yu-Wei Wu, Kai Deng, Carrie D Nicora, Joshua T Aldrich, Dario Frey, Sebastian Kolinko, Errol W Robinson, Jon M Jacobs, Paul D Adams and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer HirasJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Yu-Wei WuJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Kai DengJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biological and Materials Science Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California, USA.
Carrie D NicoraBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Joshua T AldrichEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Dario FreyJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA Faculty of Biotechnology, University of Applied Sciences Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Sebastian KolinkoJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Errol W RobinsonEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Jon M JacobsBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Paul D AdamsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Trent R NorthenJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Blake A SimmonsJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA.
Steven W SingerJoint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, California, USA Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA SWSinger@lbl.gov.
Joint BioEnergy Institute · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USSandia National Laboratories California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledGlycoside hydrolases (GHs) are key enzymes in the depolymerization of plant-derived cellulose, a process central to the global carbon cycle and the conversion of plant biomass to fuels and chemicals. A limited number of GH families hydrolyze crystalline cellulose, often by a processive mechanism along the cellulose chain. During cultivation of thermophilic cellulolytic microbial communities, substantial differences were observed in the crystalline cellulose saccharification activities of supernatants recovered from divergent lineages. Comparative community proteomics identified a set of cellulases from a population closely related to actinobacterium Thermobispora bispora that were highly abundant in the most active consortium. Among the cellulases from T. bispora, the abundance of a GH family 12 (GH12) protein correlated most closely with the changes in crystalline cellulose hydrolysis activity. This result was surprising since GH12 proteins have been predominantly characterized as enzymes active on soluble polysaccharide substrates. Heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of the suite of T. bispora hydrolytic cellulases confirmed that the GH12 protein possessed the highest activity on multiple crystalline cellulose substrates and demonstrated that it hydrolyzes cellulose chains by a predominantly random mechanism. This work suggests that the role of GH12 proteins in crystalline cellulose hydrolysis by cellulolytic microbes should be reconsidered. IMPORTANCE: Cellulose is the most abundant organic polymer on earth, and its enzymatic hydrolysis is a key reaction in the global carbon cycle and the conversion of plant biomass to biofuels. The glycoside hydrolases that depolymerize crystalline cellulose have been primarily characterized from isolates. In this study, we demonstrate that adapting microbial consortia from compost to grow on crystalline cellulose generated communities whose soluble enzymes exhibit differential abilities to hydrolyze crystalline cellulose. Comparative proteomics of these communities identified a protein of glycoside hydrolase family 12 (GH12), a family of proteins previously observed to primarily hydrolyze soluble substrates, as a candidate that accounted for some of the differences in hydrolytic activities. Heterologous expression confirmed that the GH12 protein identified by proteomics was active on crystalline cellulose and hydrolyzed cellulose by a random mechanism, in contrast to most cellulases that act on the crystalline polymer in a processive mechanism.

Indexed as

Microbial ConsortiaActinobacteriaCelluloseGlycoside HydrolasesHydrolysisProteomeProteomicsCelluloseGlycoside HydrolasesProteome

Identifiers

PMID27555310
PMCPMC4999548
OpenAlexW2509799921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.