SynthesismBio2016
Looking for a Signal in the Noise: Revisiting Obesity and the Microbiome.
Synthesis in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 353 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
353 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Unravelling the role of the gut microbiome in antipsychotic-induced weight gain and metabolic dysfunction in humans and rodents: A systematic review.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Gut Microbiota in Pediatric Obesity and Metabolic Disorders: Insights from a Comprehensive Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Integrative metagenomic analysis reveals distinct gut microbial signatures related to obesity.BMC microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring the Dynamic Relationship between the Gut Microbiome and Body Composition across the Human Lifespan: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2024Pooled it
- Alterations in gut and genital microbiota associated with gynecological diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of probiotics at different intervention time on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Searching for a Consensus Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Studies: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Pooled it
- The effects of helminth infections on the human gut microbiome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2023Pooled it
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Pooled it
- Host phenotype classification from human microbiome data is mainly driven by the presence of microbial taxa.PLoS computational biology · 2022Pooled it
- Gut Microbiome Composition in Obese and Non-Obese Persons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Multi-omic meta-analysis identifies functional signatures of airway microbiome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The ISME journal · 2020Pooled it
- Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Alterations in Overweight or Obese Adult Population after Weight-LossInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Trial
- Trial
- The Gut Microbiota during a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention.Nutrients · 2021Trial
- Microbiome connections with host metabolism and habitual diet from 1,098 deeply phenotyped individuals.Nature medicine · 2021Trial
- Effects of a Vegetarian Diet on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, Gut Microbiota, and Plasma Metabolome in Subjects With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Randomized, Crossover Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Trial
- Baseline gut microbiome ecology predicts long-term fat mass loss after bariatric surgery: evidence for a thriftyGut microbes · 2026Observational
- Gut microbiota and immunometabolism in obesity.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Population scale analysis reveals gut microbiome diversity and functional shifts linked to obesity.iScience · 2026Article
293 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledTwo recent studies have reanalyzed previously published data and found that when data sets were analyzed independently, there was limited support for the widely accepted hypothesis that changes in the microbiome are associated with obesity. This hypothesis was reconsidered by increasing the number of data sets and pooling the results across the individual data sets. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were used to identify 10 studies for an updated and more synthetic analysis. Alpha diversity metrics and the relative risk of obesity based on those metrics were used to identify a limited number of significant associations with obesity; however, when the results of the studies were pooled by using a random-effect model, significant associations were observed among Shannon diversity, the number of observed operational taxonomic units, Shannon evenness, and obesity status. They were not observed for the ratio of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes or their individual relative abundances. Although these tests yielded small P values, the difference between the Shannon diversity indices of nonobese and obese individuals was 2.07%. A power analysis demonstrated that only one of the studies had sufficient power to detect a 5% difference in diversity. When random forest machine learning models were trained on one data set and then tested by using the other nine data sets, the median accuracy varied between 33.01 and 64.77% (median, 56.68%). Although there was support for a relationship between the microbial communities found in human feces and obesity status, this association was relatively weak and its detection is confounded by large interpersonal variation and insufficient sample sizes. IMPORTANCE: As interest in the human microbiome grows, there is an increasing number of studies that can be used to test numerous hypotheses across human populations. The hypothesis that variation in the gut microbiota can explain or be used to predict obesity status has received considerable attention and is frequently mentioned as an example of the role of the microbiome in human health. Here we assessed this hypothesis by using 10 independent studies and found that although there is an association, it is smaller than can be detected by most microbiome studies. Furthermore, we directly tested the ability to predict obesity status on the basis of the composition of an individual's microbiome and found that the median classification accuracy is between 33.01 and 64.77%. This type of analysis can be used to design future studies and expanded to explore other hypotheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.