ArticlePediatric cardiology2016
Variability of Myocardial Repolarization in Pediatric Patients with a Ventricular Septal Defect.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Hypothermia on Myocardial Depolarization and Repolarization in Neonates with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Due to Asphyxia.Pediatric cardiology · 2022Article
- Electrocardiographic RR and QT Interval Variability in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect and Healthy Children.Pediatric cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with a ventricular septal defect, left-to-right shunting increases the left ventricular preload. This pathological change affects myocardial depolarization and repolarization and has the potential to evoke arrhythmogenic substrates. We examined the effect of ventricular septal defects on myocardial repolarization by investigating the variability in the repolarization interval. This retrospective study included 19 patients (mean age, 1.8 ± 2.1 years) who underwent surgical closure (mean left-to-right shunt ratio, 2.60 ± 0.55) and 26 age-matched healthy controls from 2008 to 2015. Using preoperative electrocardiograms, we studied two electrocardiographic parameters (heart rate-corrected repolarization and variability of repolarization) and four repolarization intervals (QT, JT, J point to T peak [JTp], and T peak to T end [Tp-e] intervals). The variability index (VI) was calculated from the logarithm of the ratio of the repolarization parameter variance to heart rate variance. The various measures were compared between the patients and controls, and significant differences were found in the corrected QT, JTp, and Tp-e intervals (p < 0.05). The VI of the four intervals also showed significant differences (patients vs. CONTROLS: QTVI, -0.55 ± 0.61 vs. -1.10 ± 0.53; JTVI, -0.33 ± 0.60 vs. -0.86 ± 0.57; JTpVI, -0.15 ± 0.78 vs. -0.73 ± 0.56; Tp-eVI, 0.75 ± 0.70 vs. 0.11 ± 0.73, respectively; p < 0.05). No correlation was found between the QTVI and corrected QT interval using linear regression analysis. These repolarization characteristics provide not only electrophysiological indices but also a new index with which to assess the pathophysiology of congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27554253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.