Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553865›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2017

Victimization and Vulnerability: A Study of Incarceration, Interpersonal Trauma, and Patient-Physician Trust.

Alexandra Junewicz, Kelly J Kleinert, Nancy Neveloff Dubler, Arthur Caplan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra JunewiczDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA. Alexandra.junewicz@nyumc.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-2983
Kelly J KleinertJanian Medical Care, New York City, NY, USA.
Nancy Neveloff DublerThe Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Arthur CaplanDivision of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
City University of New York · USNew York City Health and Hospitals Corporation · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the critical importance of patient-physician trust, it may be compromised among vulnerable patients, such as (1) incarcerated patients and (2) those patients who have been victims of trauma. The purpose of this study was to examine patient-physician trust among forensic and civilian psychiatric inpatient populations and to explore whether it varied based on a patient's history of incarceration and/or victimization. A trust survey (WFPTS) and a trauma instrument (LEC-5) were administered to 93 patients hospitalized on forensic and civilian psychiatric hospital units in a large, urban public hospital. Results showed no difference in patient-physician trust between incarcerated and civilian patients. Similarly, there was no effect of a history of physical assault or sexual assault on ratings of patient-physician trust. However, the hospitalized civilian and forensic patients who reported being the victim of weapons assault had significantly lower patient-physician trust scores than their counterparts.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultCrime VictimsHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPrisonersPsychological TraumaTrustViolenceYoung AdultIncarcerationPatient–physician relationshipTraumaTrust

Identifiers

PMID27553865
OpenAlexW2510157606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.