ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic sphincter augmentation in the management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication compared to endoscopic and surgical procedures for GERD treatment: a randomized trials network meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.The British journal of surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation After Gastric Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsPooled it
- Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Trial
- Gatherings in Esophagology: Innovations and Future Directions in the Diagnosis and Management of Reflux Disease.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Longer-term outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023Article
- The role of magnetic sphincter augmentation in the gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment pathway: the gastroenterology perspective.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023Article
- Removal of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device: an assessment of etiology, clinical presentation, and management.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Safety profile of magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Loosening the belt on magnetic sphincter augmentation indications: does body mass index matter?Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Magnetic challenge against gastroesophageal reflux.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Evolution of a novel technology for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a safety perspective of magnetic sphincter augmentation.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2021Article
- Magnetic sphincter augmentation with hiatal hernia repair: long term outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with prior bariatric and anti-reflux surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- More beads, more peristaltic reserve, better outcomes: factors predicting postoperative dysphagia after magnetic sphincter augmentation.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Outcomes in Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- A narrative review of gastroesophageal reflux in the pediatric patient.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Review
- Development of pseudoachalasia following magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with restoration of peristalsis after endoscopic dilation.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), but its efficacy in patients with large hiatal hernias has yet to be proven. The aim of our study was to assess outcomes of MSA in patients with hiatal hernias ≥3 cm.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent MSA at our institutions over a 6-year period. Information obtained consisted of patient demographics, symptoms of GERD, preoperative GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQL) scores, perioperative details, and implantation of the MSA device. Primary endpoints included postoperative GERD-HRQL scores, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, symptom change, and procedure-related complications. A large hiatal hernia was defined as a hernia measuring ≥3 cm by intraoperative measurement.
resultsA total of 192 patients were reviewed. Median follow-up was 20 months (3-75 months). Mean GERD-HRQL scores in the overall population before and after MSA were 18.9 and 5.0, respectively (p < 0.001). In the majority of patients symptoms improved or resolved (N = 177, p < 0.001). Fifty-two patients (27.0 %) had a hiatal hernia ≥3 cm (range 3-7 cm). Their mean GERD-HRQL score decreased from 20.5 to 3.6 (p < 0.001) following MSA. When compared to patients with smaller hernias, patients with large hiatal hernias had decreased postoperative PPI requirement (9.6 vs. 26.6 %, p = 0.011) and lower mean postoperative GERD-HRQL scores (3.6 vs. 5.6, p = 0.027). The percent of patients requiring postoperative intervention for dysphagia was similar (13.5 vs. 17.9 %, p = 0.522), as was the incidence of symptom resolution or improvement (98.1 vs. 91.3 %, p = 0.118).
conclusionMSA in patients with large hiatal hernias demonstrates decreased postoperative PPI requirement and mean GERD-HRQL scores compared to patients with smaller hernias. The incidence of symptom resolution or improvement and the percentage of patients requiring intervention for dysphagia are similar. Short-term outcomes of MSA are encouraging in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and large hiatal hernias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.