Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27553799›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Outcome of acute perforated cholecystitis: a register study of over 5000 cases from a quality control database in Germany.

Stefan Jansen, Johannes Doerner, Susanne Macher-Heidrich, Hubert Zirngibl, Peter C Ambe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan JansenDepartment of Surgery II, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Johannes DoernerDepartment of Surgery II, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Susanne Macher-HeidrichInstitute of Quality Control in Health Care, Medical Association Nordrhein Westphalia, Tersteegenstr. 9, 40474, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hubert ZirngiblDepartment of Surgery II, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany.
Peter C AmbeDepartment of Surgery II, HELIOS Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Witten - Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283, Wuppertal, Germany. Peter.ambe@uni-wh.de.
Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute perforated cholecystitis (APC) is probably the most severe complication of acute cholecystitis. However, data on the outcome of cholecystectomy for APC are limited to small series. This study investigated the outcomes of cholecystectomy for APC.

methodsData from a prospectively maintained quality control database in Germany were analyzed. Cases with APC were compared to cases without gallbladder perforation with regard to demographic characteristics, clinical findings and surgical outcomes.

resultsA total of 5704 patients with APC were compared to 39,661 patients without perforation. Risk factors for APC included: the male gender, advanced age (>65 years), ASA score >2, elevated white blood count (WBC), positive findings on abdominal ultrasound sonography and fever. The APC group differed significantly from the control group with regard to fever (29.8 vs. 12.2 %), elevated WBC (83.8 vs. 65.4 %) and positive findings from ultrasound sonography (84.9 vs. 78.9 %), p < 0001. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was ordered significantly more often in the APC group compared to the control group (2.3 vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.001). Surgery lasted significantly longer in the APC group (92.3 ± 40.8 vs. 73.7 ± 34.1, p < 0.001). The rates of conversion (18.9 vs. 6.8 %), bile duct injury (1.4 vs. 0.5 %), re-intervention (6.9 vs. 2.9 %) and mortality (4.3 vs. 1.3 %) were significantly higher in the APC group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the length of stay (13.4 ± 11.4 vs. 9.0 ± 8.3, p < 0.001) was significantly longer in the APC group.

conclusionAcute perforated cholecystitis is a severe complication of acute cholecystitis. Surgical dissection could be challenging with high risks of bile duct injury and conversion. The rates of morbidity and mortality are higher compared to those of patients without perforation.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCholecystitis, AcuteDatabases, FactualFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality ControlRegistriesTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisAcute perforated cholecystitisBile duct injuryConversion to open cholecystectomyGallbladder perforationLaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID27553799
OpenAlexW2509945331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.